Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
4561

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#„R” S.A. v AW „T” sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of judges – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges of those courts or bodies – Verification, by a lower court, of compliance by a higher court with requirements relating to the guarantee of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Body that does not constitute an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Primacy of EU law – Possibility of declaring a judicial decision to be null and void.#Case C-225/22.

cjeu_case ·
4562

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#'R' S.A. v AW 'T” sp. z o.o.'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of judges – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges of those courts or bodies – Verification, by a lower court, of compliance by a higher court with requirements relating to the guarantee of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Body that does not constitute an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Primacy of EU law – Possibility of declaring a judicial decision to be null and void.#Case C-225/22.

cjeu_case ·
4563

Case C-776/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – Studio Legale Ughi e Nunziante v EUIPO (Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of non-privileged parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Representation of a law firm by a partner of that firm – Lawyer having the status of third party in respect of the applicant – Presumption of independence – Rebuttal of the presumption – Conditions)

cjeu_case ·
4564

Case C-305/22, C.J. (Enforcement of a sentence further to an EAW): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București – Romania) – in the proceedings relating to the execution of the European arrest warrant issued against C.J. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Conditions for an executing Member State’s assumption of responsibility for the execution of that sentence – Article 3(2) – Concept of finally judged … in respect of the same acts – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Article 25 – Compliance with the conditions and procedure laid down by the framework decision in the event that a Member State undertakes to enforce a sentence handed down by a judgment delivered by an issuing State – Requirement of consent on the part of the issuing State as regards another Member State’s assumption of responsibility for the enforcement of such a sentence – Article 4 – Possibility for the issuing State to forward the judgment and certificate referred to in that article to the executing State – Consequences where forwarding does not take place – Principle of sincere cooperation – Article 22 – Right of the issuing State to enforce that sentence – Maintenance of the European arrest warrant – Obligation on the part of the executing judicial authority to enforce a European arrest warrant)

cjeu_case ·
4565

Case C-225/22, AW T: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Krakowie – Poland) – R S.A. v AW T sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of judges – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges of those courts or bodies – Verification, by a lower court, of compliance by a higher court with requirements relating to the guarantee of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Body that does not constitute an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Primacy of EU law – Possibility of declaring a judicial decision to be null and void)

cjeu_case ·
4567

Case C-584/25, A.T.E.S.E. and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 3 September 2025 – Enosi Oikonomikon Foreon A.T.E.S.E. A.E. – ELIKA A.T.E.E. – WL ANONYMI TECHNIKI ETAIREIA, A.T.E.S.E. Anonymi Techniki Emporiki, Symvouleutiki Nautiliaki Xenodocheiaki Etaireia – Idiotiki Epicheirisi Parochis Ypiresion Asfaleias, ELIKA A.T.E.E., WL Anonymi Techniki, Etaireia v Archi Exetasis Prodikastikon Prosfygon (A.E.P.P.), già Eniaia Archi Dimosion Symvaseon (E.A.DI.SY.)

cjeu_case ·
4570

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Damage to reputation and breach of the presumption of innocence – Non-material harm – Reality of the damage.#Case T-604/24.

cjeu_case ·
4571

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Damage to reputation and breach of the presumption of innocence – Non-material harm – Reality of the damage.#Case T-604/24.

cjeu_case ·
4572

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#LTV Leuchten & Lampen Vertriebs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a luminaire – Prior design – Ground for invalidity – Conflict with a prior design – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Oral procedure and measures of inquiry – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Misuse of powers.#Case T-599/24.

cjeu_case ·
4573

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#LTV Leuchten & Lampen Vertriebs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a luminaire – Prior design – Ground for invalidity – Conflict with a prior design – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Oral procedure and measures of inquiry – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Misuse of powers.#Case T-599/24.

cjeu_case ·
4574

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Princesse de Paris v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Princesse de Paris – Earlier national figurative mark Princess P Gold – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-525/24.

cjeu_case ·
4575

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Princesse de Paris v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Princesse de Paris – Earlier national figurative mark Princess P Gold – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-525/24.

cjeu_case ·
4576

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#W&B Television GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark W&B TV – Earlier EU figurative mark WB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division.#Case T-466/24.

cjeu_case ·
4577

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#W&B Television GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark W&B TV – Earlier EU figurative mark WB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division.#Case T-466/24.

cjeu_case ·
4580

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Discovery – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Nature of use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the trade mark was registered – Independent subcategory of goods.#Case T-404/24.

cjeu_case ·