Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
4181

Case T-406/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Manufaktur Jörg Geiger v EUIPO – Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco (PriSecco) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PriSecco – Earlier PDO Prosecco – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concept of evocation of a PDO)

cjeu_case ·
4182

Case T-354/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Mowi Poland v Commission (Public health – Specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Point 3(e) of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1141 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of frozen product – Lack of consultation with EFSA – Article 13 of Regulation No 853/2004)

cjeu_case ·
4183

Case T-326/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO – Domu Brands (BTFY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark BTFY – Earlier EU word mark Butterfly – Earlier national trade names Butterfly and BTY – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
4185

Case T-238/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Karić v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
4187

Case T-196/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Digi International v EUIPO – Teraoka Seiko (DIGI) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark DIGI – Earlier EU figurative mark DIGI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
4189

Case T-32/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Barry’s Bootcamp v EUIPO – Hummel (Device of eight inverted chevrons) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing eight inverted black chevrons – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility)

cjeu_case ·
4190

Case T-31/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Barry’s Bootcamp v EUIPO – Hummel (Device of two chevrons pointing to the right) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two chevrons pointing to the right – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark)

cjeu_case ·
4193

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Investigation conducted by OLAF – Transfer for the duration of the investigation – Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Request for the use of documents under Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory measure – Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure – Partial inadmissibility – Interests of the service – Equivalence of posts – Liability.#Case T-1083/23.

cjeu_case ·
4194

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Investigation conducted by OLAF – Transfer for the duration of the investigation – Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Request for the use of documents under Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory measure – Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure – Partial inadmissibility – Interests of the service – Equivalence of posts – Liability.#Case T-1083/23.

cjeu_case ·
4197

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing two horizontal black chevrons – Action for annulment – Time limits for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-390/23.

cjeu_case ·
4198

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing two horizontal black chevrons – Action for annulment – Time limits for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-390/23.

cjeu_case ·