Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
41223

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 7 mars 2019.#Balázs-Árpád Izsák et Attila Dabis contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Droit institutionnel – Initiative citoyenne – Règlement (UE) no 211/2011 – Enregistrement de la proposition d’initiative citoyenne – Article 4, paragraphe 2, sous b) – Condition que la proposition ne soit pas manifestement en dehors du cadre des attributions de la Commission européenne en vertu desquelles elle peut présenter une proposition d’acte juridique aux fins de l’application des traités – Charge de la preuve – Cohésion économique, sociale et territoriale – Article 174 TFUE – Initiative citoyenne “Politique de cohésion pour l’égalité des régions et le maintien des cultures régionales” – Demande d’enregistrement – Refus de la Commission.#Affaire C-420/16 P.

cjeu_case ·
41224

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2019.#Balázs-Árpád Izsák and Attila Dabis v European Commission.#Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Citizens’ initiative — Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Registration of the proposed citizens’ initiative — Article 4(2)(b) — Condition that the proposed initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties — Burden of proof — Economic, social and territorial cohesion — Article 174 TFEU — Citizens’ initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ — Application for registration — Refusal by the Commission.#Case C-420/16 P.

cjeu_case ·
41225

Case C-420/16 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2019 — Balázs-Árpád Izsák, Attila Dabis v European Commission, Hungary, Hellenic Republic, Romania, Slovak Republic (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Citizens’ initiative — Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Registration of the proposed citizens’ initiative — Article 4(2)(b) — Condition that the proposed initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties — Burden of proof — Economic, social and territorial cohesion — Article 174 TFEU — Citizens’ initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ — Application for registration — Refusal by the Commission)

cjeu_case ·
41226

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 March 2019.#Antony C. Tweedale v European Food Safety Authority.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to toxicity studies conducted in connection with the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment.#Case T-716/14.

cjeu_case ·
41227

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 March 2019.#Antony C. Tweedale v European Food Safety Authority.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to toxicity studies conducted in connection with the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment.#Case T-716/14.

cjeu_case ·
41228

Case T-716/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Tweedale v EFSA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to toxicity studies conducted in connection with the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment)

cjeu_case ·
41233

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2019.#Serenity Pharmaceuticals LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark NOCUVANT — Earlier word marks NOCUTIL — Proof of genuine use — Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-321/18.

cjeu_case ·
41236

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 6 March 2019.#Patent-och registreringsverket v Mats Hansson.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 4(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Overall impression — Earlier trade mark registered with a disclaimer — Effects of such a disclaimer on the extent of protection of the earlier trade mark.#Case C-705/17.

cjeu_case ·
41238

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2019.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to property.#Case T-289/15.

cjeu_case ·
41239

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2019.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to property.#Case T-289/15.

cjeu_case ·
41240

Case T-289/15: Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2019 — Hamas v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to property)

cjeu_case ·