40441Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 30 April 2019.#Criminal proceedings against X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juge d'instruction du tribunal de grande instance de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2000/31/EC — Information society services — Directive 2006/123/EC — Services — Connection of hosts, whether businesses or individuals, with accommodation to rent with persons seeking that type of accommodation — Qualification — National legislation imposing certain restrictions on the exercise of the profession of real estate agent — Directive 2000/31/EC — Article 3(4)(b), second indent — Obligation to give notification of measures restricting the freedom to provide information society services — Failure to give notification — Enforceability — Criminal proceedings with an ancillary civil action.#Case C-390/18.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40442Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 30 April 2019.#CeDe Group AB v KAN Sp. z o.o. in bankruptcy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Articles 4 and 6 — Insolvency proceedings — Applicable law — European order for payment procedure — Failure to pay a contractual claim before bankruptcy — Exception of set-off based on a contractual claim arising prior to bankruptcy.#Case C-198/18.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40443Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 April 2019.#Dumitru-Tudor Dorobantu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Grounds for refusal of execution — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment — Conditions of detention in the issuing Member State — Assessment by the executing judicial authority — Criteria.#Case C-128/18.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40444Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) v European Commission.#State aid — General corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by France in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Existing aid — Concept of economic activity — Services of general interest — Principle of sound administration — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Case T-754/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40445Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Union des Ports de France - UPF v European Commission.#State aid – Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by France in favour of its ports – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Existing aid – Concept of economic activity – Obligation to state reasons – Distortions of competition and effect on trade between Member States – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-747/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40446Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Union des Ports de France - UPF v European Commission.#State aid – Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by France in favour of its ports – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Existing aid – Concept of economic activity – Obligation to state reasons – Distortions of competition and effect on trade between Member States – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-747/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40447Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Francis Wattiau v European Parliament.#Civil service — Social security — JSIS — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Agreement concluded, in particular, between the European Union, Luxembourg and the Entente des hôpitaux luxembourgeois on the scales of fees for hospital care received by JSIS members — Plea of illegality — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — First paragraph of Article 18 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 39 of the Joint Rules on sickness insurance for officials.#Case T-737/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40448Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Francis Wattiau v European Parliament.#Civil service — Social security — JSIS — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Agreement concluded, in particular, between the European Union, Luxembourg and the Entente des hôpitaux luxembourgeois on the scales of fees for hospital care received by JSIS members — Plea of illegality — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — First paragraph of Article 18 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 39 of the Joint Rules on sickness insurance for officials.#Case T-737/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40449Case T-754/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — Chambre de commerce et d’industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) v Commission (State aid — General corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by France in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Existing aid — Concept of economic activity — Services of general interest — Principle of sound administration — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment)cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40450Case T-747/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2019. — UPF v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by France in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Existing aid — Concept of economic activity — Obligation to state reasons — Distortions of competition and effect on trade between Member States — Principle of sound administration)cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40451Case T-737/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — Wattiau v Parliament (Civil service — Social Security — JSIS — Reimbursement of medical costs — Agreement concluded inter alia between the European Union, Luxembourg and the Entente des hôpitaux luxembourgeois on the scales of fees for hospital care received by JSIS members — Plea of illegality — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — First paragraph of Article 18 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 39 of the Joint rules on sickness insurance for officials)cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40452Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 30 April 2019.#EU-Canada CET Agreement.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (CETA) — Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) — Establishment of a Tribunal and an Appellate Tribunal — Compatibility with primary EU law — Requirement to respect the autonomy of the EU legal order — Level of protection of public interests determined, in accordance with the EU constitutional framework, by the EU institutions –– Equal treatment of Canadian investors and EU investors — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 20 — Access to the above Tribunals and their independence — Article 47 of the Charter — Financial accessibility — Commitment to guarantee that accessibility for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises — External and internal aspects of the requirement of independence — Appointment, remuneration and ethics of the Members — Role of the CETA Joint Committee — Binding interpretations of the CETA determined by that Committee.#Opinion 1/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40453Ordonnance de rectification du 30 avril 2019.#Bashar Ibrahim e.a. contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland et Bundesrepublik Deutschland contre Taus Magamadov.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaires jointes C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 et C-438/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40454Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 30 avril 2019.#République italienne contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Recours en annulation – Politique commune de la pêche – Conservation des ressources – Convention internationale pour la conservation des thonidés de l’Atlantique – Total admissible des captures (TAC) pour l’espadon méditerranéen – Règlement (UE) 2017/1398 – Fixation des possibilités de pêche pour l’année 2017 – Compétence exclusive de l’Union – Détermination de la période de référence – Fiabilité des données de base – Étendue du contrôle juridictionnel – Article 17 TUE – Gestion des intérêts de l’Union au sein d’organes internationaux – Principe de stabilité relative – Conditions d’application – Principes de non-rétroactivité, de sécurité juridique, de confiance légitime et de non-discrimination.#Affaire C-611/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40455Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Italian Republic v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common fisheries policy — Conservation of resources — International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas — Total allowable catch (TAC) for Mediterranean swordfish — Regulation (EU) 2017/1398 — Fixing of fishing opportunities for 2017 — Exclusive competence of the European Union — Determination of the reference period — Reliability of the basic facts — Scope of judicial review — Article 17 TEU — Management of the EU’s interests within international bodies — Principle of relative stability — Conditions under which applicable — Principles of non-retroactivity, legal certainty, legitimate expectation and non-discrimination.#Case C-611/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40456Opinion 1/17: Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 30 April 2019 — Kingdom of Belgium (Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (CETA) — Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) — Establishment of a Tribunal and an Appellate Tribunal — Compatibility with primary EU law — Requirement to respect the autonomy of the EU legal order — Level of protection of public interests determined, in accordance with the EU constitutional framework, by the EU institutions — Equal treatment of Canadian investors and EU investors — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 20 — Access to the above Tribunals and their independence — Article 47 of the Charter — Financial accessibility — Commitment to guarantee that accessibility for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises — External and internal aspects of the requirement of independence — Appointment, remuneration and ethics of the Members — Role of the CETA Joint Committee — Binding interpretations of the CETA determined by that Committee)cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40457Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 30 April 2019.#„EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia“ EAD v Nikolina Stefanova Dimitrova and „Toplofikatsia Sofia“ EAD v Mitko Simeonov Dimitrov.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Asenovgrad and Sofiyski rayonen sad.#References for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Consumer law — Article 2(1) — Concept of ‘consumer’ — Article 3(1) — Contract concluded between a trader and a consumer — Contract for the supply of district heating — Article 27 — Inertia selling — Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market — Article 5 — Prohibition of unfair commercial practices — Annex I — Unsolicited supply — National law requiring each owner of a property in a building in co-ownership connected to a district heating network to contribute to the costs of thermal energy consumption by the common areas and internal installation of the building — Energy efficiency — Directive 2006/32/EC — Article 13(2) — Directive 2012/27/EU — Article 10(1) — Billing information — National law providing that, in a building in co-ownership, bills for the consumption of thermal energy by the internal installation are calculated, for each owner of an apartment in the building, in proportion to the heated volume of his or her apartment.#Joined Cases C-708/17 and C-725/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40458Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 30 April 2019.#Hochtief Solutions AG Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Székesfehérvári Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures — Directive 89/665/EEC — Directive 92/13/EEC — Right to effective judicial protection — Principles of effectiveness and equivalence — Action for review of judicial decisions in breach of EU law — Liability of the Member States in the event of infringement of EU law by national courts or tribunals — Assessment of damage eligible for compensation.#Case C-620/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40459Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 30 April 2019.#Alekszij Torubarov v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary — Refusal by the competent administrative or quasi-judicial body to comply with a decision of that court or tribunal.#Case C-556/17.cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019
40460Case C-611/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2019 — Italian Republic v Council of the European Union (Actions for annulment — Common fisheries policy — Conservation of resources — International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas — Total allowable catch (TAC) for Mediterranean swordfish — Regulation (EU) 2017/1398 — Fixing of fishing opportunities for 2017 — Exclusive competence of the European Union — Determination of the reference period — Reliability of the basic facts — Scope of judicial review — Article 17 TEU — Management of the EU’s interests within international bodies — Principle of relative stability — Conditions under which applicable — Principles of non-retroactivity, legal certainty, legitimate expectation and non-discrimination)cjeu_case · 30 avril 2019