40041Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 May 2019.#Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v Research Executive Agency (REA).#Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Development of a system to monitor process and quality in the sector of industrial food production — Food-Watch Project — Overlap of the project with another project funded under the same programme — Information requirements on beneficiaries — Decision to demand repayment of the financial contribution paid under the grant agreement.#Case T-104/18.cjeu_case · 20 mai 2019
40042Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 May 2019.#Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v Research Executive Agency (REA).#Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Development of a system to monitor process and quality in the sector of industrial food production — Food-Watch Project — Overlap of the project with another project funded under the same programme — Information requirements on beneficiaries — Decision to demand repayment of the financial contribution paid under the grant agreement.#Case T-104/18.cjeu_case · 20 mai 2019
40043Case T-715/18: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2019 — Phreneos and Others v Commission (Public supply contracts — Tender procedure — Planning, preparation, promotion and implementation of the event ‘European Development Days’ — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer — Annulment of the procurement procedure — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 20 mai 2019
40044Case T-685/18: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2019 — Apple v EUIPO — Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 20 mai 2019
40045Case T-104/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 May 2019 — Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v REA (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Development of a system to monitor process and quality in the sector of industrial food production — Food-Watch Project — Overlap of the project with another project funded under the same programme — Information requirements on beneficiaries — Decision to demand repayment of the financial contribution paid under the grant agreement)cjeu_case · 20 mai 2019
40047Case T-306/19: Action brought on 17 May 2019 — Graanhandel P. van Schelven v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 mai 2019
40048Case C-390/19 P: Appeal brought on 17 May 2019 by the Italian Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2019 in Case T-135/15 Italy v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 mai 2019
40049Case C-388/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) lodged on 17 May 2019 — MK v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneiracjeu_case · 17 mai 2019
40050Case C-387/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 17 May 2019 — RTS infra BVBA, Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewestcjeu_case · 17 mai 2019
40051Case T-237/18: Order of the General Court of 17 May 2019 — Martini-Sportswear v EUIPO — Olympique de Marseille (M) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark M — Withdrawal of the contested measure — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2019
40052Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 May 2019.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission.#Action for annulment — State aid — Measures implemented by Germany in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport — Decision declaring the aid compatible in part with the internal market — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Indirect aid — No individual concern — Inadmissibility.#Case T-764/15.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2019
40053Case T-764/15: Order of the General Court of 17 May 2019 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Measures implemented by Germany in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport — Decision declaring the aid compatible in part with the internal market — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Indirect aid — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2019
40054Case C-386/19 P: Appeal brought on 16 May 2019 by Hamas against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 6 March 2019 in Case T-289/15 Hamas v Councilcjeu_case · 16 mai 2019
40055Case C-385/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from International Protection Appeals Tribunal (Ireland) made on 16 May 2019 — Ms R.A.T., Mr D.S. v Minister for Justice and Equalitycjeu_case · 16 mai 2019
40056Case C-384/19: Action brought on 16 May 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spaincjeu_case · 16 mai 2019
40057Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related product — Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products — Delegated Regulation and implementing acts — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility.#Case T-396/18.cjeu_case · 16 mai 2019
40058Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#KID-Systeme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SKYFi — Earlier national and EU word marks SKY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Identity of goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Suspension of the administrative procedure — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Misuse of powers — Right to a fair trial — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Article 96 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-354/18.cjeu_case · 16 mai 2019
40059Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (Extracts).#Transtec v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Framework contract for the provision of services – Services to third countries benefiting from external aid – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers – Allegations of grave professional misconduct against a tenderer – No final judgment or final administrative decision establishing grave professional misconduct – Conditions for referral to the panel referred to in Article 108 of the Financial Regulation – Abnormally low tenders – Obligation to state reasons – Taking into account of a letter sent by the awarding authority after the action had been brought – Right to an effective remedy – Standstill period for bringing an action against the award decision – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination – Articles 105a, 106, 108, 113 and 118 of the Financial Regulation – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-228/18.cjeu_case · 16 mai 2019
40060Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (Extracts).#Transtec v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Framework contract for the provision of services – Services to third countries benefiting from external aid – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers – Allegations of grave professional misconduct against a tenderer – No final judgment or final administrative decision establishing grave professional misconduct – Conditions for referral to the panel referred to in Article 108 of the Financial Regulation – Abnormally low tenders – Obligation to state reasons – Taking into account of a letter sent by the awarding authority after the action had been brought – Right to an effective remedy – Standstill period for bringing an action against the award decision – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination – Articles 105a, 106, 108, 113 and 118 of the Financial Regulation – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-228/18.cjeu_case · 16 mai 2019