Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
40021

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision of the Commission’s Validation Panel on qualification as a micro, small and medium-sized business — Request for review under sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 of the Annex to Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom — No administrative appeal within the meaning of Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Res judicata — Criteria for the definition of micro, small and medium-sized businesses in EU policies — Concept of an ‘enterprise’ — Concept of an ‘economic activity’ — Criterion of independence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-604/15.

cjeu_case ·
40022

Case T-604/15: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2019 — Ertico — ITS Europe v Commission (Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision of the Commission’s Validation Panel on qualification as a micro, small and medium-sized business — Request for review under sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 of the Annex to Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom — No administrative appeal within the meaning of Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Res judicata — Criteria for the definition of micro, small and medium-sized businesses in EU policies — Concept of an ‘enterprise’ — Concept of an ‘economic activity’ — Criterion of independence — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
40029

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 May 2019.#Anikó Pint v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Third indent of Article 4(2) — Public access to documents — Documents relating to an EU Pilot procedure — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Overriding public interest in disclosure — Claim for directions to be issued to an EU institution — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-770/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
40030

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 May 2019.#Volkswagen AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of figurative mark MAIN AUTO WHEELS — Opposition proceedings — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) — Obligation to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-744/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
40032

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 21 May 2019.#Nalini Chenchooliah v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Article 21 TFUE — Right of Union citizens and their family members to move and reside freely in the territory of a Member State — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 3(1) and Articles 15, 27, 28, 30 and 31 — Definition of ‘beneficiary’ — Third-country national, the spouse of a Union citizen who has exercised his right to freedom of movement — Return of the Union citizen to the Member State of which he is a national, where he is serving a prison sentence — Requirements imposed on the host Member State under Directive 2004/38/EC when making a decision to remove such a third-country national.#Case C-94/18.

cjeu_case ·
40034

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 May 2019.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to property — National legislation extinguishing, without compensation, the rights of usufruct over agricultural and forestry land acquired by legal persons or by natural persons who cannot demonstrate a close family tie with the owner of the land.#Case C-235/17.

cjeu_case ·
40035

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 May 2019.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to property — National legislation extinguishing, without compensation, the rights of usufruct over agricultural and forestry land acquired by legal persons or by natural persons who cannot demonstrate a close family tie with the owner of the land.#Case C-235/17.

cjeu_case ·
40036

Case C-235/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 May 2019 — European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to property — National legislation extinguishing, without compensation, the rights of usufruct over agricultural and forestry land acquired by legal persons or by natural persons who cannot demonstrate a close family tie with the owner of the land)

cjeu_case ·