Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
3962

Case C-114/25, Himov: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – SV v CY (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive (EU) 2024/1069 – Applicability ratione temporis and ratione materiae – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
3964

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025.#BR v Direktor na Natsionalno tol upravlenie, Agentsia « Patna infrastruktura ».#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court of Justice and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-549/24.

cjeu_case ·
3965

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025.#BR v Direktor na Natsionalno tol upravlenie, Agentsia « Patna infrastruktura ».#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court of Justice and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-549/24.

cjeu_case ·
3966

Case C-549/24, Direktor na Natsionalno tol upravlenie: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Varna – Bulgaria) – BR v Direktor na Natsionalno tol upravlenie, Agentsia Patna infrastruktura (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court of Justice and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
3972

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2025.#SC Sadalbari SRL v Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Response which may be clearly deduced from the case-law – Markets in financial instruments – Directive 2004/39/EC – Article 4(1)(14) – Definition of ‘regulated market’ – Authorisation – Functional requirements – Market administered, following a merger, by a legal person also administering a regulated market – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-163/25.

cjeu_case ·
3973

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2025.#SC Sadalbari SRL v Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Response which may be clearly deduced from the case-law – Markets in financial instruments – Directive 2004/39/EC – Article 4(1)(14) – Definition of ‘regulated market’ – Authorisation – Functional requirements – Market administered, following a merger, by a legal person also administering a regulated market – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-163/25.

cjeu_case ·
3980

Case C-200/25, Fidelidade: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo – Portugal ) – AF, IL v Comissão de Mercados de Valores Mobiliários (CMVM), Fidelidade-Companhia de Seguros SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·