Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
39461

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 26 June 2019.#Gennaro Cafaro v DQ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 – Annex I, Point FCL.065 – Scope ratione temporis – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Discrimination on grounds of age – Article 2(5) – Article 4(1) – National legislation providing for the automatic termination of the employment relationship at the age of 60 – Aircraft pilots – Protection of national security.#Case C-396/18.

cjeu_case ·
39462

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 26 June 2019.#Coöperatieve Producentenorganisatie en Beheersgroep Texel UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulations (EU) Nos 1303/2013, 1379/2013 and 508/2014 — Fishery and aquaculture producer organisations — Production and marketing plans — Financial support for the preparation and implementation of those plans — Conditions of eligibility of costs — Discretion of the Member States — No possibility under national law to apply for financial support.#Case C-386/18.

cjeu_case ·
39463

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 June 2019.#State Street Bank International GmbH v Banca d'Italia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2014/59/EU — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions — National financing arrangement — Resolution authority — National fund — Articles 103 and 104 — Obligation to contribute — Ex ante contributions and extraordinary ex post contributions — Calculation — Late transposition of the directive — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 — Articles 12 and 14 — Concept of ‘change of status’ — Impact on the obligation to contribute.#Case C-255/18.

cjeu_case ·
39464

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 26 June 2019.#Tulliallan Burlington Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Word and figurative marks ‘BURLINGTON’ — Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier word and figurative marks ‘BURLINGTON’ and ‘BURLINGTON ARCADE’ — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Nice Agreement — Class 35 — Concept of ‘retail services’ — Article 8(4) — Passing-off — Article 8(5) — Reputation — Criteria for assessment — Similarity between the goods and services — Opposition rejected.#Joined Cases C-155/18 P to C-158/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
39465

Case C-407/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Višje sodišče v Mariboru — Slovenia) — Aleš Kuhar, Jožef Kuhar v Addiko Bank d.d. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Proceedings for the enforcement of a mortgage claim — Directly enforceable notarial instrument — Judicial review of unfair terms — Suspension of enforcement — Lack of jurisdiction of the court hearing the request for enforcement — Consumer protection — Principle of effectiveness — Proper interpretation)

cjeu_case ·
39467

Case C-159/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the juge de paix du troisième canton de Charleroi — Belgium) — André Moens v Ryanair Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Presence of petrol on an airport runway)

cjeu_case ·
39468

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Instrument for pre-accession assistance — Third country — National public procurement — Devolved management — Decision of a national authority — Investigations by OLAF — Non-material damage — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 — Principle of sound administration — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to be heard.#Case T-617/17.

cjeu_case ·
39471

Case T-617/17: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2019 — Vialto Consulting v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Instrument for pre-accession assistance — Third country — National public procurement — Devolved management — Decision of a national authority — Investigations by OLAF — Nonmaterial damage — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 — Principle of sound administration — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to be heard)

cjeu_case ·
39473

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 26 juin 2019.#Commission européenne contre République hellénique.#Manquement d’État – Article 258 TFUE – Article 49 TFUE – Directive 2006/123/CE – Article 15, paragraphes 2 et 3 – Directive 2005/36/CE – Articles 13, 14, 50 et annexe VII – Liberté d’établissement – Reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles – Règles nationales concernant les prestataires de formation des médiateurs.#Affaire C-729/17.

cjeu_case ·
39475

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 26 juin 2019.#Lies Craeynest e.a. contre Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest et Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2008/50/CE – Articles 6, 7, 13 et 23 – Annexe III – Évaluation de la qualité de l’air – Critères permettant de constater un dépassement des valeurs limites de dioxyde d’azote – Mesures effectuées à l’aide des points de prélèvement fixes – Choix des sites appropriés – Interprétation des valeurs mesurées aux points de prélèvement – Obligations des États membres – Contrôle juridictionnel – Intensité du contrôle – Pouvoir d’injonction.#Affaire C-723/17.

cjeu_case ·
39476

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest and Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/50/EC — Articles 6, 7, 13 and 23 — Annex III — Assessment of air quality — Criteria for determining whether the nitrogen dioxide limit values have been exceeded — Measurements using fixed sampling points — Choice of appropriate sites — Interpretation of the values measured at the sampling points — Obligations of the Member States — Judicial review — Intensity of the review — Power to issue directions.#Case C-723/17.

cjeu_case ·
39478

Case C-723/17: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/50/EC — Articles 6, 7, 13 and 23 — Annex III — Assessment of air quality — Criteria for determining whether the nitrogen dioxide limit values have been exceeded — Measurements using fixed sampling points — Choice of appropriate sites — Interpretation of the values measured at the sampling points — Obligations of the Member States — Judicial review — Intensity of the review — Power to issue directions)

cjeu_case ·
39479

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 June 2019.#NRW. Bank v Single Resolution Board.#Action for annulment — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Setting of the ex ante contribution for 2016 — Time limit for bringing an action — Delay — Article 76 of the Rules of procedure of the General Court — Inadmissibility.#Case T-466/16.

cjeu_case ·