Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
38541

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 10 September 2019.#Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3(1) — Right of communication to the public — Making available — Article 4 — Distribution right — Exhaustion — Electronic books (e‑books) — Virtual market for ‘second-hand’ e‑books.#Case C-263/18.

cjeu_case ·
38542

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 10 September 2019.#Marc Gómez del Moral Guasch v Bankia SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia °n 38 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement — Variable interest rate — Reference index based on mortgage loans granted by savings banks — Index arising from a regulatory or administrative provision — Unilateral introduction of the term by the seller or supplier — Review of the transparency requirement by the national court — Consequences of a finding that the term is unfair.#Case C-125/18.

cjeu_case ·
38543

Case C-123/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2019 — HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping GmbH v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the appellant following its inclusion in the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for damages – Conditions which must be met in order for the European Union to incur non-contractual liability – Concept of ‘sufficiently serious breach of a rule of EU law’ – Assessment – Concept of ‘company owned or controlled’ – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
38544

Case C-94/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Nalini Chenchooliah v Minister for Justice and Equality (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21 TFEU – Right of Union citizens and their family members to move and reside freely in the territory of a Member State – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3(1) and Articles 15, 27, 28, 30 and 31 – Definition of ‘beneficiary’ – Third-country national, the spouse of a Union citizen who has exercised his right to freedom of movement – Return of the Union citizen to the Member State of which he is a national, where he is serving a prison sentence – Requirements imposed on the host Member State under Directive 2004/38/EC when making a decision to remove such a third-country national)

cjeu_case ·
38545

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2019.#Trasys International EEIG and Axianseu - Digital Solutions SA v European Aviation Safety Agency.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – IT application and infrastructure management services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the existence of abnormally low tenders – Characteristics and relative merits of the tenders accepted – Request for a statement of reasons made by a tenderer who is not in an exclusion situation and whose tender is compliant with the procurement documents.#Case T-741/17.

cjeu_case ·
38546

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2019.#Trasys International EEIG and Axianseu - Digital Solutions SA v European Aviation Safety Agency.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – IT application and infrastructure management services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the existence of abnormally low tenders – Characteristics and relative merits of the tenders accepted – Request for a statement of reasons made by a tenderer who is not in an exclusion situation and whose tender is compliant with the procurement documents.#Case T-741/17.

cjeu_case ·
38547

Case T-741/17: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2019 — Trasys International and Axianseu — Digital Solutions v EASA (Public service contracts – Tender procedure – IT application and infrastructure management services – Rejection of a tenderer’s offer and award of the contract to other tenderers – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the existence of abnormally low tenders – Characteristics and relative merits of the tenders accepted – Request for a statement of reasons from a tenderer who is not in an exclusion situation and whose tender is compliant with the procurement documents)

cjeu_case ·
38548

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2019.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Internal market in natural gas — Directive 2009/73/EC — Commission Decision approving the variation of the conditions for the exemption from EU requirements of the rules governing the operation of the OPAL pipeline in regard to third party access and tariff regulation — Article 36(1) of Directive 2009/73 — Principle of energy solidarity.#Case T-883/16.

cjeu_case ·
38549

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2019.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Internal market in natural gas — Directive 2009/73/EC — Commission Decision approving the variation of the conditions for the exemption from EU requirements of the rules governing the operation of the OPAL pipeline in regard to third party access and tariff regulation — Article 36(1) of Directive 2009/73 — Principle of energy solidarity.#Case T-883/16.

cjeu_case ·
38560

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 September 2019.#Shore Capital International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark The Inner Circle — Earlier EU word mark InnerCircle — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-575/18.

cjeu_case ·