Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
38501

Case C-46/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Caseificio Sociale San Rocco Soc. coop. arl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Regione Veneto (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Milk and milk products sector – Quotas – Additional levy – Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 – Article 2 – Collection of the levy by the purchaser – Deliveries exceeding the reference quantity available to producers – Amount from the price of the milk – Compulsory application of a deduction – Reimbursement of the amount of excess levy – Regulation (EC) No 1392/2001 – Article 9 – Buyer – Failure to comply with obligation to collect additional levy – Producers – Failure to comply with the monthly payment obligation – Protection of legitimate expectations)

cjeu_case ·
38505

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Oana Mădălina Călin contre Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Dâmboviţa e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Principes du droit de l’Union – Autonomie procédurale – Principes d’équivalence et d’effectivité – Principe de sécurité juridique – Autorité de la chose jugée – Restitution des taxes perçues par un État membre en violation du droit de l’Union – Décision juridictionnelle définitive imposant le paiement d’une taxe incompatible avec le droit de l’Union – Demande en révision d’une telle décision juridictionnelle – Délai pour l’introduction de cette demande.#Affaire C-676/17.

cjeu_case ·
38506

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Oana Mădălina Călin v Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Dâmboviţa and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Ploieşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of EU law — Procedural autonomy — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Principle of legal certainty — Res judicata — Recovery of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law — Final decision of a court or tribunal imposing payment of a tax which is incompatible with EU law — Request for revision of such a decision — Time limit for submitting that request.#Case C-676/17.

cjeu_case ·
38507

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Federazione Italiana Golf (FIG) contre Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT) et Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze et Federazione Italiana Sport Equestri (FISE) contre Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (UE) no 549/2013 – Système européen des comptes nationaux et régionaux dans l’Union européenne – Annexe A, point 20.15 – Contrôle exercé par un Comité national olympique sur des fédérations sportives nationales constituées sous la forme d’institutions sans but lucratif (ISBL) – Annexe A, point 20.15, deuxième phrase – Notion d’“intervention publique sous forme de réglementation générale s’appliquant à toutes les unités dans un même domaine d’activité” – Portée – Annexe A, point 20.15, première phrase – Notion de “pouvoir de déterminer [la] politique générale ou [le] programme” d’une ISBL – Portée – Annexe A, point 2.39, sous d), point 20.15, sous d), et point 20.309, sous i), dernière phrase – Prise en compte des cotisations versées par les adhérents à l’ISBL.#Affaires jointes C-612/17 et C-613/17.

cjeu_case ·
38508

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Federazione Italiana Golf (FIG) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Federazione Italiana Sport Equestri (FISE) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Control by a National Olympic Committee of national sports federations in the form of non-profit institutions (NPIs) – Second sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – First sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘ability to determine the general policy or programme’ of an NPI – Scope – Paragraph 2.39(d), paragraph 20.15(d) and the last sentence of paragraph 20.309(i) of Annex A – Account taken of membership fees paid to the NPI.#Joined Cases C-612/17 and C-613/17.

cjeu_case ·
38509

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#Royalty Pharma Collection Trust v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 — Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products — Conditions for obtaining such a certificate — Article 3(a) — Concept of a ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ — Assessment criteria.#Case C-650/17.

cjeu_case ·
38510

Case C-676/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Ploiești — Romania) — Oana Mădălina Călin v Direcția Regională a Finanțelor Publice Ploiești — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Dâmbovița, Statul Român — Ministerul Finanțelor Publice, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Res judicata – Recovery of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law – Final decision of a court or tribunal imposing payment of a tax which is incompatible with EU law – Application for revision of such a decision – Time limit within which that application must be submitted)

cjeu_case ·
38511

Joined Cases C-613/17 and C-613/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti, Italy) — Federazione Italiana Golf (FIG) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica — ISTAT, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze (C-612/17), Federazione Italiana Sport Equestri (FISE) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT) (C-613/17) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European System of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Annex A, paragraph 20.15 – Control exercised by a National Olympic Committee over national sporting federations constituted in the form of non-profit institutions (NPIs) – Annex A, Paragraph 20.15, second sentence – Concept of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, first sentence – Concept of ‘ability to determine the general policy or programme’ of an NPI – Scope – Annex A, paragraph 2.39(d), paragraph 20.15(d), and paragraph 20.309(i), last sentence – Taking into account of contributions paid by members to the NPI)

cjeu_case ·
38512

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#George Haswani v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Modification of the application — Admissibility — Need to modify pleas in law and arguments — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law.#Case T-231/15 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
38513

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#George Haswani v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Modification of the application — Admissibility — Need to modify pleas in law and arguments — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law.#Case T-231/15 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
38517

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 September 2019.#Wirecard Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal not demonstrating the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-375/19 P.

cjeu_case ·