Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
38304

Case T-476/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Arysta LifeScience Netherlands v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance diflubenzuron — Review of approval — Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Rights of the defence — Ultra vires — Manifest error of assessment — Procedure for renewal of approval — Article 14 of Regulation No 1107/2009 — Imposition, in the context of the review procedure, of additional restrictions limiting the use of the active substance at issue without waiting for the outcome of the renewal procedure — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
38306

Case T-176/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — WhiteWave Services v EUIPO — Fernandes (VeGa one) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark VeGa one — International registration designating the European Union in respect of the earlier word mark Vegas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
38308

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019.#FIH Holding A/S and FIH A/S, formerly FIH Erhvervsbank A/S v European Commission.#State aid — Banking sector — Aid granted to FIH in the form of a transfer of its impaired assets to a new subsidiary and the subsequent purchase thereof by the body responsible for guaranteeing financial stability — State aid for banks during the crisis — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Admissibility — Calculation of the amount of the aid — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-386/14 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
38309

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019.#FIH Holding A/S and FIH A/S, formerly FIH Erhvervsbank A/S v European Commission.#State aid — Banking sector — Aid granted to FIH in the form of a transfer of its impaired assets to a new subsidiary and the subsequent purchase thereof by the body responsible for guaranteeing financial stability — State aid for banks during the crisis — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Admissibility — Calculation of the amount of the aid — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-386/14 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
38310

Case T-386/14 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — FIH Holding and FIH v Commission (State aid — Banking sector — Aid granted to FIH in the form of a transfer of its impaired assets to a new subsidiary and the subsequent purchase thereof by the body responsible for guaranteeing financial stability — State aid for banks during the crisis — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Admissibility — Calculation of the amount of the aid — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
38319

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Registered Community design representing pneumatic power tools — Invalidity proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Expiry of the time limit within which to intervene under Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under that provision — Application, in the alternative, for leave to intervene under Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure made within the time limit — Whether permissible.#Case T-748/18.

cjeu_case ·
38320

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Registered Community design representing pneumatic power tools — Invalidity proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Expiry of the time limit within which to intervene under Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under that provision — Application, in the alternative, for leave to intervene under Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure made within the time limit — Whether permissible.#Case T-748/18.

cjeu_case ·