37641Case T-712/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 – Hikma Pharmaceuticals and Hikma Pharmaceuticals International v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37642Case T-711/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 – SSP Group and SSP Financing v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37643Case T-710/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 – Sthree and Sthree Overseas Holdings v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37644Case T-708/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 – Bujar v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37645Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#United States Seafoods LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark UNITED STATES SEAFOODS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-10/19.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37646Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#United States Seafoods LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark UNITED STATES SEAFOODS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-10/19.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37647Case T-145/19: Order of the General Court of 17 October 2019 — Jap Energéticas y Medioambientales v Commission (Action for annulment — Grant agreement concluded under the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) — Debit note — Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable — No reclassification of the action — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37648Case T-10/19: Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2019 — United States Seafoods v EUIPO — (UNITED STATES SEAFOODS) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark UNITED STATES SEAFOODS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37649Case C-767/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgiumcjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37650Case C-762/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rīgas apgabaltiesas Civillietu tiesu kolēģija (Latvia) lodged on 17 October 2019 — SIA ‘CV-Online Latvia’ v SIA ‘Melons’cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37651Case C-761/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 — European Commission v Hungarycjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37652Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-628/18.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37653Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-628/18.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37654Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AXICORP ALLIANCE — Earlier EU word and figurative marks ALLIANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Interpretation of the description of the goods reproduced in the alphabetical list accompanying the Nice Classification.#Case T-279/18.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37655Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AXICORP ALLIANCE — Earlier EU word and figurative marks ALLIANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Interpretation of the description of the goods reproduced in the alphabetical list accompanying the Nice Classification.#Case T-279/18.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37656Case T-628/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2019 — E.I. Papadopoulos v EUIPO — Europastry (fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37657Case T-279/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2019 — Alliance Pharmaceuticals v EUIPO — AxiCorp (AXICORP ALLIANCE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AXICORP ALLIANCE — Earlier EU word and figurative marks ALLIANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Interpretation of the description of the goods reproduced in the alphabetical list accompanying the Nice Classification)cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37658Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 octobre 2019.#Unitel Sp. z o.o. contre Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 146 – Exonérations à l’exportation – Notion de “livraison de biens” – Article 131 – Conditions fixées par les États membres – Principe de proportionnalité – Principe de neutralité fiscale – Preuves – Fraude – Pratique d’un État membre consistant à refuser le droit à exonération lorsque l’acquéreur des biens exportés n’est pas identifié.#Affaire C-653/18.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37659Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Unitel Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 146 — Exemptions on exportation — Concept of ‘supply of goods’ — Article 131 — Conditions laid down by the Member States — Principle of proportionality — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Evidence — Tax evasion — Practice of a Member State consisting in refusing the right to exemption where the person acquiring the goods exported is not identified.#Case C-653/18.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019
37660Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 17 octobre 2019.#Ministère public et Ministre des Finances du Royaume de Belgique contre QC et Comida paralela 12.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Droits d’accise – Directive 2008/118/CE – Articles 8 et 38 – Débiteur de droits d’accise à la suite de l’introduction irrégulière de produits sur le territoire d’un État membre – Notion – Société civilement responsable des faits commis par son gérant.#Affaire C-579/18.cjeu_case · 17 octobre 2019