Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
37508

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 24 octobre 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-614/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37509

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-614/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37510

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 24 octobre 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-613/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37511

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-613/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37512

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37513

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37514

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Porr Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Taxable amount — Reduction — Directive 2006/112/EEC — Article 90 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Debt that became irrecoverable following insolvency proceedings.#Case C-292/19.

cjeu_case ·
37515

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Porr Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Taxable amount — Reduction — Directive 2006/112/EEC — Article 90 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Debt that became irrecoverable following insolvency proceedings.#Case C-292/19.

cjeu_case ·