37321Case T-764/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – Keller Holdings v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37322Case T-763/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – Ultra Electronics Holdings and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37323Case T-762/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – Rio Tinto European Holdings and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37324Case T-761/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – Willis Europe v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37325Case T-760/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – Imperial Brands and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37326Case T-759/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – Yalwen v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37327Case T-758/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – W.S. Atkins International v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37328Case C-821/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 — European Commission v Hungarycjeu_case · 8 novembre 2019
37329Order of the President of the General Court of 7 November 2019.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Application for interim measures — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Active substance ethoprophos — Conditions for approval for placing the substance on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency.#Case T-317/19 R.cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37330Order of the President of the General Court of 7 November 2019.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Application for interim measures — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Active substance ethoprophos — Conditions for approval for placing the substance on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency.#Case T-317/19 R.cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37331Case T-756/19: Action brought on 7 November 2019 – WPP Jubilee and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37332Case T-754/19: Action brought on 7 November 2019 – Stagecoach Group v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37333Case T-753/19: Action brought on 7 November 2019 — Ungureanu v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37334Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#A9.com, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bell — Absolute ground for refusal — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-240/19.cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37335Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#A9.com, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bell — Absolute ground for refusal — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-240/19.cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37336Case T-317/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 7 November 2019 — AMVAC Netherlands v Commission (Application for interim measures — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Active substance ethoprophos — Conditions for approval for placing the substance on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency)cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37337Case T-240/19: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 — A9.com v EUIPO (Representation of a bell) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bell — Absolute ground for refusal — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37338Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#OM v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca - MIUR and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the grounds justifying why an answer to the questions referred is necessary — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-569/19.cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37339Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#OM v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca - MIUR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Potenza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the grounds justifying why an answer to the questions referred is necessary — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-569/19.cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019
37340Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#P.J. v (X) S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient detail concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-513/19.cjeu_case · 7 novembre 2019