Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
36804

Case T-692/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Montanari v EEAS (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Ad hoc inspection report — Refusal of access — Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 — Article 8(b) of Regulation No 45/2001 — Transfer of personal data — Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of investigations — Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
36807

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Wajos GmbH.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Absolute ground for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Three-dimensional marks consisting of the shape of the product — Criteria for the assessment of distinctive character — Obligation to state reasons — Form of a container — Amphora.#Case C-783/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36808

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Wajos GmbH.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Absolute ground for refusal — Marks devoid of distinctive character — Three-dimensional marks consisting of the shape of the product — Criteria for the assessment of distinctive character — Obligation to state reasons — Form of a container — Amphora.#Case C-783/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36810

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 10(2) — Optional provision — Prerequisites for exercising the right to family reunification — Member of a refugee’s family not referred to in Article 4 — Concept of a ‘dependant’.#Case C-519/18.

cjeu_case ·
36811

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 décembre 2019.#WA contre Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 79/7/CEE – Égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes en matière de sécurité sociale – Article 4, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Calcul des prestations – Directive 2006/54/CE – Égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes en matière d’emploi et de travail – Législation nationale prévoyant le droit à un complément de pension pour les femmes ayant eu au moins deux enfants biologiques ou adoptés et percevant une pension contributive d’incapacité permanente – Non-attribution de ce droit aux hommes placés dans une situation identique – Situation comparable – Discrimination directe fondée sur le sexe – Dérogations – Absence.#Affaire C-450/18.

cjeu_case ·
36812

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#WA v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Gerona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 79/7/EEC — Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security — Article 4(1) and (2) — Article 7(1) — Calculation of benefits — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation — National legislation granting a right to a pension supplement for women who have had at least two biological or adopted children, and who are in receipt of a contributory permanent incapacity pension — Same right not granted to men in an identical situation — Comparable situation — Direct discrimination on grounds of sex — No exceptions.#Case C-450/18.

cjeu_case ·
36813

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Otis Gesellschaft m.b.H. and Others v Land Oberösterreich and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 101 TFEU — Damages for the loss caused by a cartel — Right to compensation of persons not acting as supplier or purchaser on the market affected by the cartel — Damage suffered by a public body which granted loans on favourable terms in order to acquire assets subject to the cartel.#Case C-435/18.

cjeu_case ·
36814

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Otis Gesellschaft m.b.H. and Others v Land Oberösterreich and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 101 TFEU — Damages for the loss caused by a cartel — Right to compensation of persons not acting as supplier or purchaser on the market affected by the cartel — Damage suffered by a public body which granted loans on favourable terms in order to acquire assets subject to the cartel.#Case C-435/18.

cjeu_case ·
36815

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 décembre 2019.#ML contre Aktiva Finants OÜ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Exigence d’une procédure contradictoire et d’un recours effectif – Décision d’une juridiction nationale déclarant exécutoire un arrêt prononcé par une juridiction d’un autre État membre – Procédure d’autorisation d’interjeter appel nationale.#Affaire C-433/18.

cjeu_case ·
36816

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#ML v Aktiva Finants OÜ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Requirement for adversarial proceedings and an effective remedy — Decision of a national court declaring enforceable a judgment delivered by a court of another Member State — National procedure granting leave for further consideration of an appeal.#Case C-433/18.

cjeu_case ·
36817

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 décembre 2019.#G.S. et V.G. contre Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Politique d’immigration – Directive 2003/86/CE – Droit au regroupement familial – Conditions requises pour l’exercice du droit au regroupement familial – Notion de “raisons d’ordre public” – Rejet d’une demande d’entrée et de séjour d’un membre de la famille – Retrait d’un titre de séjour d’un membre de la famille ou refus de le renouveler.#Affaires jointes C-381/18 et C-382/18.

cjeu_case ·
36818

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#G.S. and V.G. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#References for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Immigration policy — Directive 2003/86/EC — Right to family reunification — Requirements for the exercise of the right to family reunification — Concept of ‘grounds of public policy’ — Rejection of an application for entry and residence of a family member — Withdrawal of or refusal to renew a residence permit of a family member.#Joined Cases C-381/18 and C-382/18.

cjeu_case ·
36819

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 décembre 2019.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid contre E.P.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Règlement (UE) 2016/399 – Code de l’Union relatif au régime de franchissement des frontières par les personnes (code frontières Schengen) – Article 6 – Conditions d’entrée pour les ressortissants de pays tiers – Notion de “menace pour l’ordre public” – Décision de retour à l’encontre d’un ressortissant d’un pays tiers en séjour irrégulier.#Affaire C-380/18.

cjeu_case ·
36820

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v E.P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) — Article 6 — Entry conditions for third-country nationals — Concept of ‘threat to public policy’ — Return decision issued to an illegally staying third-country national.#Case C-380/18.

cjeu_case ·