36021Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 12 février 2020.#Procédure pénale contre Nikolay Kolev e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Mise en œuvre d’une décision préjudicielle de la Cour – Pouvoir d’injonction d’une juridiction supérieure quant aux modalités de mise en œuvre – Autonomie procédurale des États membres – Principe d’effectivité – Respect des droits de la défense.#Affaire C-704/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
36022Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#Criminal proceedings against Nikolay Boykov Kolev and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Implementation of a preliminary ruling of the Court — Power of a higher court to impose an injunction relating to the detailed rules for implementation — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principle of effectiveness — Observance of the rights of the defence.#Case C-704/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
36023Case C-704/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against Nikolay Kolev and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Implementation of a preliminary ruling of the Court — Power of a higher court to impose an injunction relating to the detailed rules for implementation — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principle of effectiveness — Observance of the rights of the defence)cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
36024Case T-81/20: Action brought on 11 February 2020 — Klose v EUIPO (Representation of three coloured segments in a rectangle)cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36025Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Philip Jakober v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cup — Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal.#Case T-262/19.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36026Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Philip Jakober v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cup — Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal.#Case T-262/19.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36027Case T-262/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2020 — Jakober v EUIPO (Shape of a cup) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cup — Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal)cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36028Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 February 2020.#Susanne Rutzinger-Kurpas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-887/19 P.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36029Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 February 2020.#Susanne Rutzinger-Kurpas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-887/19 P.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36030Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark charantea — Earlier EU figurative mark CHARITÉ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-733/18.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36031Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark charantea — Earlier EU figurative mark CHARITÉ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-733/18.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36032Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark charantea — Earlier EU figurative mark CHARITÉ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-732/18.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36033Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark charantea — Earlier EU figurative mark CHARITÉ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-732/18.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36034Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Stada Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark ViruProtect — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Duty to state reasons.#Case T-487/18.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36035Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2020.#Stada Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark ViruProtect — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Duty to state reasons.#Case T-487/18.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36036Case T-733/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2020 — Dalasa v EUIPO — Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin (charantea) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark charantea — Earlier EU figurative mark CHARITÉ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36037Case T-732/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2020 — Dalasa v EUIPO — Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin (charantea) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark charantea — Earlier EU figurative mark CHARITÉ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36038Case T-487/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2020 — Stada Arzneimittel AG v EUIPO (ViruProtect) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark ViruProtect — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Duty to state reasons)cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36039Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 February 2020.#OC e.a. and Others v Banca d'Italia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Article 63 et seq. TFEU — Free movement of capital — Article 107 et seq. TFEU — State aid — Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom to conduct a business — Right to property — Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Prudential requirements applicable to credit institutions and investment firms — Article 29 — Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Article 6(4) — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Conferral of specific tasks on the European Central Bank (ECB) — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 241/2014 — Regulatory technical standards for Own Funds requirements for institutions — National regulation imposing an asset threshold on people’s banks established as cooperative societies and allowing the right to redeem shares by the withdrawing shareholder to be limited.#Case C-686/18.cjeu_case · 11 février 2020
36040Case T-77/20: Action brought on 10 February 2020 — Ascenza Agro and Afrasa v Commissioncjeu_case · 10 février 2020