35961Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#Dominique Bilde v European Parliament.#Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Manifest error of assessment — Electa una via — Principle of ne bis in idem — Misuse of powers.#Case T-248/19.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35962Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#Dominique Bilde v European Parliament.#Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Manifest error of assessment — Electa una via — Principle of ne bis in idem — Misuse of powers.#Case T-248/19.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35963Case T-326/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Gerber v Parliament and Council (Interim measures — EU customs territory — Regulation (EU) 2019/474 — Directive (EU) 2019/475 — Inclusion of the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano — Application for interim measures — Manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35964Case T-248/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Bilde v Parliament (Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Manifest error of assessment — Electa una via — Principle of ne bis in idem — Misuse of powers)cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35965Case C-792/19: Order of the President of the Court of 12 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — TUIfly GmbH v EUflight.de GmbHcjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35966Case C-522/19: Order of the President of the Court of 12 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta — Spain) — DC v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SAcjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35967Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#ZF v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pension – Decision determining pension rights – Pension statements – Action for annulment – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Delay – Purely confirmatory act – Partial inadmissibility – Recovery of undue payments – Classification in grade and step – Multiplication factor – Withdrawal of an unlawful act – Legitimate expectation – Reasonable time.#Case T-605/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35968Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#ZF v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pension – Decision determining pension rights – Pension statements – Action for annulment – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Delay – Purely confirmatory act – Partial inadmissibility – Recovery of undue payments – Classification in grade and step – Multiplication factor – Withdrawal of an unlawful act – Legitimate expectation – Reasonable time.#Case T-605/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35969Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#Hungary v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Support for rural development — Support granted to producer groups — Expenditure incurred by Hungary — Article 35 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — Qualified recognition — Eligibility of the beneficiary of the aid — Calculated financial correction — Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Sincere cooperation — Protection of legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Ineligible amounts.#Case T-505/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35970Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#Hungary v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Support for rural development — Support granted to producer groups — Expenditure incurred by Hungary — Article 35 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — Qualified recognition — Eligibility of the beneficiary of the aid — Calculated financial correction — Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Sincere cooperation — Protection of legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Ineligible amounts.#Case T-505/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35971Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#WD v European Food Safety Authority.#Civil service — Temporary agents — Fixed term contract — Decision not to reclassify — Lack of staff reports — Carrying forward reclassification points — Manifest error of assessment — Non-renewal decision — Duty of care — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of power — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Duty to state reasons — Right to a hearing — Liability.#Case T-320/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35972Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#WD v European Food Safety Authority.#Civil service — Temporary agents — Fixed term contract — Decision not to reclassify — Lack of staff reports — Carrying forward reclassification points — Manifest error of assessment — Non-renewal decision — Duty of care — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of power — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Duty to state reasons — Right to a hearing — Liability.#Case T-320/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35973Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-177/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35974Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-177/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35975Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Lambert Mende Omalanga v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality – Modification of the forms of order sought.#Case T-176/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35976Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Lambert Mende Omalanga v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality – Modification of the forms of order sought.#Case T-176/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35977Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-175/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35978Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-175/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35979Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-174/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020
35980Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-174/18.cjeu_case · 12 février 2020