Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
35061

Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 29 avril 2020.#Ramada Storax SA contre Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Articles 90 et 273 – Base d’imposition – Réduction – Non-paiement – Insolvabilité du débiteur domicilié à l’extérieur du pays – Décision rendue par une juridiction d’un autre État membre attestant du caractère irrécouvrable des créances réclamées – Principes de neutralité fiscale et de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-756/19.

cjeu_case ·
35062

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Ramada Storax SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 90 and 273 — Taxable amount — Reduction — Non-payment — Insolvency of the debtor residing outside the country — Ruling by a court of another Member State declaring debts claimed irrecoverable — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case C-756/19.

cjeu_case ·
35065

Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 29 avril 2020.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni contre BT Italia SpA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/20/CE – Article 12 – Taxes administratives imposées aux entreprises fournissant un service ou un réseau de communications électroniques – Coûts administratifs de l’autorité réglementaire nationale pouvant être couverts par une taxe – Bilan annuel des coûts administratifs et de la somme totale des taxes perçues.#Affaire C-399/19.

cjeu_case ·
35066

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni v BT Italia SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Article 12 — Administrative charges imposed on undertakings providing an electronic communications service or network — Administrative costs of the national regulatory authority which may be covered by a charge — Yearly overview of the administrative costs and the total of charges levied.#Case C-399/19.

cjeu_case ·
35067

Case C-756/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Ramada Storax SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 90 and 273 — Taxable amount — Reduction — Non-payment — Insolvency of the debtor residing outside the country — Ruling by a court of another Member State declaring debts claimed irrecoverable — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
35068

Case C-399/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni v BT Italia SpA and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Article 12 — Administrative charges imposed on undertakings providing an electronic communications service or network — Administrative costs of the national regulatory authority which may be covered by a charge — Yearly overview of the administrative costs and the total of charges levied)

cjeu_case ·
35069

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Tilly-Sabco v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Agriculture – Export refunds – Poultrymeat – Regulation (EU) 2018/1277 adopted following the annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 by a judgment of the Court of Justice – Competence of the author of the act – Abuse of process – Obligation to state reasons – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage.#Case T-707/18.

cjeu_case ·
35070

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Tilly-Sabco v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Agriculture – Export refunds – Poultrymeat – Regulation (EU) 2018/1277 adopted following the annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 by a judgment of the Court of Justice – Competence of the author of the act – Abuse of process – Obligation to state reasons – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage.#Case T-707/18.

cjeu_case ·
35071

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Intercontact Budapest Fordító és Pénzügyi Tanácsadó Kft. (Intercontact Budapest Kft.) v Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union.#Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of translation services of texts in the financial and banking fields from English into Hungarian — Ranking of a tenderer — Article 113(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 — Obligation to state reasons — Tender price of the highest ranked tenderers — Refusal of disclosure.#Case T-640/18.

cjeu_case ·
35072

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Intercontact Budapest Fordító és Pénzügyi Tanácsadó Kft. (Intercontact Budapest Kft.) v Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union.#Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of translation services of texts in the financial and banking fields from English into Hungarian — Ranking of a tenderer — Article 113(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 — Obligation to state reasons — Tender price of the highest ranked tenderers — Refusal of disclosure.#Case T-640/18.

cjeu_case ·
35075

Case T-707/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Tilly-Sabco v Council and Commission (Agriculture — Export refunds — Poultrymeat — Regulation (EU) 2018/1277 adopted following the annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 by a judgment of the Court of Justice — Competence of the author of the act — Abuse of process — Obligation to state reasons — Non-contractual liability — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Damage)

cjeu_case ·