Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
34601

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#FZ v DER Touristik GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 12 – Package tour – Long delay of a flight – Passenger compensation – Further compensation — Passenger’s right to a reduction of the price of the trip.#Case C-153/19.

cjeu_case ·
34606

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 28 May 2020.#Société Eco TLC v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire and Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State resources’ – Increased responsibility of producers – Eco-body approved by the public authorities to collect financial contributions from those who place on the market certain products in order to be able to fulfil, on their behalf, their legal obligation to treat waste from those products – Financial support paid by that eco-body to contractually bound sorting operators.#Case C-556/19.

cjeu_case ·
34607

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 28 May 2020.#Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o. v Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public service contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 2(1)(5) – Concept of ‘public contract’ – Concept of ‘contract for pecuniary interest’ – Tenderer’s bid at a price of EUR 0.00 – Rejection of the tender – Article 69 – Abnormally low tender.#Case C-367/19.

cjeu_case ·
34608

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 28 May 2020.#EZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions for granting refugee status – Refusal to perform military service – Article 9(2)(e) – Law of the country of origin which does not provide for the right to conscience objection – Protection of persons who have fled their country of origin after the expiry of the period for suspending military service – Article 9(3) – Connection between the reasons mentioned in Article 10 of that directive and the prosecution and punishment referred to in Article 9(2)(e) of that directive – Evidence.#Case C-238/19.

cjeu_case ·
34609

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 May 2020.#B. v Centre public d'action sociale de Líège (CPAS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Third-country national suffering from a serious illness – Return decision – Judicial remedy – Automatic suspensory effect – Conditions – Grant of social assistance – Articles 19 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-233/19.

cjeu_case ·
34610

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 28 May 2020.#Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Article 29 TEU – Article 215 TFEU – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation – Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities covered by the freezing of financial funds and resources – Actions for damages – Jurisdiction of the CJEU to hear and determine an action for damages for the harm allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Inadequate statement of reasons for legal acts imposing restrictive measures.#Case C-134/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
34611

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 May 2020.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Electronic communications – Universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/22/EC – Networks and services – Article 13 – Financing of universal service obligations – Sharing mechanism – Principles of transparency, least market distortion, non-discrimination and proportionality.#Case C-49/19.

cjeu_case ·
34612

Case C-153/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — FZ v DER Touristik GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 12 — Package tour — Long delay of a flight — Passengers’ compensation — Additional compensation — Passenger’s right to a reduction in the price of the journey)

cjeu_case ·
34617

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Environment – Fluorinated greenhouse gases – Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 – Placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market – Decision finding that an undertaking exceeded the quota allocated to it and imposing on it a penalty – Correction of the electronic registry for quotas – Transfer of quota – Authorisation to use a quota – Principle of good administration.#Case T-739/18.

cjeu_case ·
34618

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Environment – Fluorinated greenhouse gases – Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 – Placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market – Decision finding that an undertaking exceeded the quota allocated to it and imposing on it a penalty – Correction of the electronic registry for quotas – Transfer of quota – Authorisation to use a quota – Principle of good administration.#Case T-739/18.

cjeu_case ·
34619

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Earlier EU word mark AUREA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Correction of the Board of Appeal’s decision — Article 102 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-724/18 and T-184/19.

cjeu_case ·
34620

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Earlier EU word mark AUREA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Correction of the Board of Appeal’s decision — Article 102 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-724/18 and T-184/19.

cjeu_case ·