34581Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Martínez Albainox, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark TASER – Earlier EU word marks TASER – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Detriment to reputation – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-341/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34582Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Martínez Albainox, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark TASER – Earlier EU word marks TASER – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Detriment to reputation – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-341/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34583Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Christos Ntolas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark GN GENETIC NUTRITION LABORATORIES – Earlier EU word mark GNC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-333/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34584Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Christos Ntolas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark GN GENETIC NUTRITION LABORATORIES – Earlier EU word mark GNC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-333/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34585Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 May 2020 (Extracts).#AW v European Parliament.#Civil service — Officials — Social security — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Common rules on the insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease — Article 16 — Statement of occupational disease — Article 22 — Medical Committee — Refusal to recognise the occupational nature of a disease — Irregularity of the opinion of the Medical Committee.#Case T-213/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34586Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 May 2020 (Extracts).#AW v European Parliament.#Civil service — Officials — Social security — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Common rules on the insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease — Article 16 — Statement of occupational disease — Article 22 — Medical Committee — Refusal to recognise the occupational nature of a disease — Irregularity of the opinion of the Medical Committee.#Case T-213/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34587Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU figurative marks We IntelliGence the World, currencymachineassistant, robodealer, currencyassistant, tradingcurrencyassistant, CKPL, moneypersonalassistant, moneyassistant, currencypersonalassistant, CNTX Trading, AIdealer and CNTX — Earlier EU and UK figurative marks representing two intertwining circles or two overlapping circles — Suspension of proceedings — Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Cases T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T-98/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34588Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU figurative marks We IntelliGence the World, currencymachineassistant, robodealer, currencyassistant, tradingcurrencyassistant, CKPL, moneypersonalassistant, moneyassistant, currencypersonalassistant, CNTX Trading, AIdealer and CNTX — Earlier EU and UK figurative marks representing two intertwining circles or two overlapping circles — Suspension of proceedings — Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Cases T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T-98/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34589Case T-564/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 —Lozano Arana and Others v EUIPO — Coltejer (LIBERTADOR) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark LIBERTADOR — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Due notification — Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed — Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625)cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34590Case T-506/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Workplace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis Holding (UMA WORKSPACE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UMA WORKSPACE — Earlier EU figurative mark and earlier UK figurative and word marks WORKSPACE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34591Case T-342/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Martínez Albainox v EUIPO — Taser International (TASER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark TASER — Earlier EU word marks TASER — Relative grounds for refusal — Detriment to reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34592Case T-341/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Martínez Albainox v EUIPO — Taser International (TASER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark TASER — Earlier EU word marks TASER — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Detriment to reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34593Case T-333/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Ntolas v EUIPO — General Nutrition Investment (GN GENETIC NUTRITION LABORATORIES) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark GN GENETIC NUTRITION LABORATORIES — Earlier EU word mark GNC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34594Case T-213/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — AW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Common rules on the insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease — Article 16 — Statement of occupational disease — Article 22 — Medical Committee — Refusal to recognise the occupational nature of a disease — Irregularity of the opinion of the Medical Committee)cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34595Cases T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T-98/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO — MasterCard International ([We IntelliGence the World and Others]) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU figurative marks We IntelliGence the World, currencymachineassistant, robodealer, currencyassistant, tradingcurrencyassistant, CKPL, moneypersonalassistant, moneyassistant, currencypersonalassistant, CNTX Trading, AIdealer and CNTX — Earlier EU and UK figurative marks representing two intertwining circles or two overlapping circles — Suspension of proceedings — Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34596Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#TN v WWK Lebensversicherung auf Gegenseitigkeit and VP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct life assurance – Directives 2002/83/EC and 2009/138/EC – Right of renunciation – Recovery of sums paid to the insurance company by way of a tax on insurance premiums – Procedures.#Case C-803/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34597Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#TN v WWK Lebensversicherung auf Gegenseitigkeit and VP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct life assurance – Directives 2002/83/EC and 2009/138/EC – Right of renunciation – Recovery of sums paid to the insurance company by way of a tax on insurance premiums – Procedures.#Case C-803/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34598Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 28 mai 2020.#ES contre Wallonische Region.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 49 TFUE – Liberté d’établissement – Circulation routière – Immatriculation de véhicules automobiles – Conducteur résidant dans un État membre – Véhicule immatriculé dans un autre État membre – Véhicule mis à la disposition de l’associé-gérant d’une société commerciale établie dans cet autre État membre – Obligation de posséder en permanence à bord du véhicule la preuve de la régularité de l’utilisation de ce véhicule – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-757/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34599Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#ES v Wallonische Region.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Road traffic – Registration of motor vehicles – Driver resident in one Member State – Vehicle registered in another Member State – Vehicle made available to the managing partner of a commercial company established in that other Member State – Obligation permanently to have on board the vehicle evidence of the lawful use of that vehicle – Proportionality.#Case C-757/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020
34600Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#FZ v DER Touristik GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 12 – Package tour – Long delay of a flight – Passenger compensation – Further compensation — Passenger’s right to a reduction of the price of the trip.#Case C-153/19.cjeu_case · 28 mai 2020