Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
3441

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Centex SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark OWN – Earlier national word mark my own – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-34/25.

cjeu_case ·
3442

Case T-34/25: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2025 – Centex v EUIPO – Adler Modemärkte (OWN) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark OWN – Earlier national word mark my own – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
3445

Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 12 novembre 2025.#V-Label GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative VRIENDLY.ORG V VEGAN – Enregistrement international antérieur de la marque de certification figurative V – Causes de nullité relative – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Caractère distinctif intrinsèque de l’enregistrement international antérieur – Caractère distinctif accru acquis par l’usage – Absence de renommée de l’enregistrement international antérieur – Article 8, paragraphe 5, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-464/24.

cjeu_case ·
3451

Case T-464/24: Action brought on 12 November 2025 – V-Label v EUIPO – Vriendly (VRIENDLY.ORG V VEGAN) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VRIENDLY.ORG V VEGAN – Earlier international registration of the figurative certification mark V – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Inherent distinctive character of the earlier international registration – Enhanced distinctiveness acquired through use – No reputation of the earlier international registration – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
3454

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Fashion TV RO SRL and Maestro SPRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi - Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța – Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct VAT – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Discontinuance of criminal proceedings in respect of natural persons – Administrative procedure relating to a company having the status of taxable person – Examination of evidence obtained during the criminal proceedings – (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law.#Case C-475/24.

cjeu_case ·
3455

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Fashion TV RO SRL and Maestro SPRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi - Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța – Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct VAT – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Discontinuance of criminal proceedings in respect of natural persons – Administrative procedure relating to a company having the capacity of taxable person – Examination of evidence obtained during the criminal proceedings – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer which may be clearly deduced from the existing case-law.#Case C-475/24.

cjeu_case ·
3456

CaseC-475/24, Fashion TV RO and Maestro: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța – Romania) – Fashion TV RO SRL, Maestro SPRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați – Serviciul Soluționare Contestații – Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați – Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța – Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct VAT – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Discontinuance of criminal proceedings in respect of natural persons – Administrative procedure relating to a company having the capacity of taxable person – Examination of evidence obtained during the criminal proceedings – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer which may be clearly deduced from the case-law)

cjeu_case ·
3458

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 November 2025.#CEE Bankwatch Network z.s. and Ökobüro - Allianz der Umweltbewegung v Council of the European Union.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Refusal of request – Act adopted on the basis of Article 122(1) TFEU – Act not capable of being the subject of a request for internal review – Article 2(1)(g) of Regulation No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention – Article 2(2) of the Aarhus Convention – Act adopted in a ‘legislative capacity’.#Case T-535/23.

cjeu_case ·
3459

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 November 2025.#CEE Bankwatch Network z.s. and Ökobüro - Allianz der Umweltbewegung v Council of the European Union.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Refusal of request – Act adopted on the basis of Article 122(1) TFEU – Act not capable of being the subject of a request for internal review – Article 2(1)(g) of Regulation No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention – Article 2(2) of the Aarhus Convention – Act adopted in a ‘legislative capacity’.#Case T-535/23.

cjeu_case ·
3460

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 November 2025.#Föreningen Svenskt Landskapsskydd and Others v Council of the European Union.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Refusal of request – Act adopted on the basis of Article 122(1) TFEU – Act not capable of being the subject of a request for internal review – Article 2(1)(g) of Regulation No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention – Article 2(2) of the Aarhus Convention – Act adopted in a ‘legislative capacity’.#Case T-534/23.

cjeu_case ·