Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
34563

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 28 May 2020.#Currency One S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-101/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
34564

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 28 May 2020.#Currency One S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-101/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
34569

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#MC v U.T.G. - Prefettura di Foggia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – General principles of EU law – Right to good administration – Right of defence – Right to be heard – Measure adopted by the prefecture aimed at prohibiting an activity on account of alleged mafia infiltration – Legislation not providing for an adversarial administrative procedure.#Case C-17/20.

cjeu_case ·
34570

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#MC v U.T.G. - Prefettura di Foggia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – General principles of EU law – Right to good administration – Right of defence – Right to be heard – Measure adopted by the prefecture aimed at prohibiting an activity on account of alleged mafia infiltration – Legislation not providing for an adversarial administrative procedure.#Case C-17/20.

cjeu_case ·
34574

Case C-17/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia — Italy) — MC v Ufficio territoriale del governo (U.T.G.) — Prefettura di Foggia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility — General principles of EU law — Right to good administration — Right of defence — Right to be heard — Measure adopted by the prefecture aimed at prohibiting an activity on account of alleged mafia infiltration — Legislation not providing for an adversarial administrative procedure)

cjeu_case ·
34575

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Antonio Lozano Arana and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – – Revocation proceedings – – EU word mark LIBERTADOR – – Genuine use of the mark – – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – – Right to be heard – – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 – – Due notification – – Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – – Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed – – Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625).#Case T-564/19.

cjeu_case ·
34576

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Antonio Lozano Arana and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – – Revocation proceedings – – EU word mark LIBERTADOR – – Genuine use of the mark – – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – – Right to be heard – – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 – – Due notification – – Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – – Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed – – Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625).#Case T-564/19.

cjeu_case ·