Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
33881

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 juillet 2020.#SL contre Vueling Airlines SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transport aérien – Convention de Montréal – Article 17, paragraphe 2 – Responsabilité des transporteurs aériens en matière de bagages enregistrés – Perte avérée d’un bagage enregistré – Droit à indemnisation – Article 22, paragraphe 2 – Limites de responsabilité en cas de destruction, de perte, d’avarie ou de retard de bagages – Absence d’informations concernant le bagage perdu – Charge de la preuve – Autonomie procédurale des États membres – Principes d’équivalence et d’effectivité.#Affaire C-86/19.

cjeu_case ·
33882

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#SL v Vueling Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 17(2) — Liability of air carriers in respect of checked baggage — Fact of loss of checked baggage established — Right to compensation — Article 22(2) — Limits of liability in the event of destruction, loss and delay of, or of damage to, baggage — Absence of information regarding the lost baggage — Burden of proof — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-86/19.

cjeu_case ·
33883

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 9 juillet 2020.#NG et OH contre SC Banca Transilvania SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Champ d’application – Article 1er, paragraphe 2 – Notion de “dispositions législatives ou réglementaires impératives” – Dispositions supplétives – Contrat de crédit libellé en devise étrangère – Clause relative au risque de change.#Affaire C-81/19.

cjeu_case ·
33884

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#NG and OH v SC Banca Transilvania SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Scope — Article 1(2) — Definition of ‘mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions’ — Supplementary provisions — Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Term relating to the foreign exchange risk.#Case C-81/19.

cjeu_case ·
33885

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 9 juillet 2020.#Direktor na Teritorialna direktsiya Yugozapadna Agentsiya « Mitnitsi », anciennement Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Aerogara Sofia contre „Curtis Balkan“ EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Code des douanes communautaire – Article 32, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Règlement (CEE) no 2454/93 – Article 157, paragraphe 2, article 158, paragraphe 3, et article 160 – Détermination de la valeur en douane – Ajustement – Redevances relatives aux marchandises à évaluer – Redevances constituant une “condition de la vente” des marchandises à évaluer – Redevances versées par l’acheteur à sa société mère en contrepartie de la fourniture du savoir-faire nécessaire à la fabrication de produits finis – Marchandises acquises auprès de tiers et constituant des composantes à incorporer dans les produits sous licence.#Affaire C-76/19.

cjeu_case ·
33886

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#Direktor na Teritorialna direktsiya Yugozapadna Agentsiya 'Mitnitsi', formerly Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Aerogara Sofia v 'Curtis Balkan' EOOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Community Customs Code — Article 32(1)(c) — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 157(2), Article 158(3), and Article 160 — Determining the customs value — Adjustment — Royalties relating to the goods being valued — Royalties constituting a ‘condition of sale’ of the goods being valued — Royalties paid by the buyer to its parent company for the supply of the know-how required for the manufacture of the finished products — Goods purchased from third parties, which constitute components to be incorporated in the licensed products.#Case C-76/19.

cjeu_case ·
33887

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#European Commission v HM.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Refusal to allow participation in the assessment tests – Request for review – Email of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) – EPSO’s failure to send the request for review to the selection board of the competition – Ground for refusal – Out of time – Classification of EPSO’s email – Decision to reject the request for review – Powers – No legal basis – Setting aside.#Case C-70/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33888

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#European Commission v HM.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Refusal to allow participation in the assessment tests – Request for review – Email of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) – EPSO’s failure to send the request for review to the selection board of the competition – Ground for refusal – Out of time – Classification of EPSO’s email – Decision to reject the request for review – Powers – No legal basis – Setting aside.#Case C-70/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33889

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 9 July 2020.#A.M. v E.M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Cosmetic products – Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 – Article 19 – Consumer information – Labelling – Information that must appear on the product container and packaging – Labelling in a foreign language – ‘Function of the cosmetic product’ – Concept – Cosmetic product packaging which contains a reference to a detailed product catalogue drafted in the language of the consumer.#Case C-667/19.

cjeu_case ·
33890

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 9 July 2020.#Jebsen & Jessen (GmbH & Co.) KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 78 – Article 236(1) – Import procedure – Revision of the customs declaration – Commercial policy – Anti-dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Price undertakings – Exemption – Article 2(1) – Condition to submit an undertaking invoice – Failure to mention an element listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation 2015/82.#Case C-543/19.

cjeu_case ·
33891

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 9 July 2020.#Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances and Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Novel foods and novel food ingredients – Regulation (EC) No 258/97 – Article 1(2)(e) – Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ – Placing on the market – Whole insects intended for human consumption.#Case C-526/19.

cjeu_case ·
33892

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 9 July 2020.#Syndicat CFTC du personnel de la Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de la Moselle v Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de Moselle.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de prud'hommes de Metz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2006/54/EC – Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in employment and occupation – Articles 14 and 28 – National collective agreement granting the right to leave following the statutory maternity leave for female workers who bring up their children on their own – Exclusion of male workers from the right to that leave – Protection of female workers as regards both the consequences of pregnancy and the condition of maternity – Conditions under which applicable.#Case C-463/19.

cjeu_case ·
33894

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 9 July 2020.#RFA International, LP v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of ferro-silicon originating in Russia – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 11(9) and (10) – Rejection of applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid – Constructed export price – Assessment as to whether the anti-dumping duties have been reflected in the resale prices and subsequent selling prices in the European Union – Obligation to apply the same methodology as in the investigation which led to the imposition of the anti-dumping duty – Change in circumstances – Deduction of anti-dumping duties paid – Conclusive evidence.#Case C-56/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33895

Case C-391/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Unipack’ АD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsiya ‘Dunavska’ kam Agentsiya ‘Mitnitsi’, Prokuror ot Varhovna administrativna prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — The Union Customs Code — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 — Article 172(2) — Authorisation for the use of the end-use procedure — Retroactive effect — Concept of ‘exceptional circumstances’ — Change of tariff classification — Binding tariff information decision no longer valid)

cjeu_case ·
33896

Case C-374/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — HF v Finanzamt Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Adjustment of deductions — Variation in the deduction entitlement — Capital goods used for both taxed and exempt transactions — Cessation of the activity giving rise to the right of deduction — Remaining use solely for exempt transactions)

cjeu_case ·
33897

Case C-343/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Klagenfurt — Austria) — Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Volkswagen AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Point 2 of Article 7 — Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict — Place where the harmful event occurred — Place where the damage occurred — Manipulation of data relating to the emission of exhaust gases from engines produced by a motor vehicle manufacturer)

cjeu_case ·
33898

Case C-297/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Naturschutzbund Deutschland — Landesverband Schleswig-Holstein e.V. v Kreis Nordfriesland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Environmental liability — Directive 2004/35/EC — Second indent of the third paragraph of Annex I — Damage not having to be classified as ‘significant damage’ — Concept of ‘normal management of sites, as defined in habitat records or target documents or as carried on previously by owners or operators’ — Article 2(7) — Concept of ‘occupational activity’ — Activity carried out in the public interest pursuant to a statutory assignment of tasks — Whether or not included)

cjeu_case ·
33899

Case C-272/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — VQ v Land Hessen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Scope — Article 2(2)(a) — Meaning of ‘activity which falls outside the scope of Union law’ — Article 4(7) — Concept of ‘controller’ — Petitions Committee of the parliament of a Federated State of a Member State — Article 15 — Right of access by the data subject)

cjeu_case ·
33900

Case C-264/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC, Google Inc. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Internet video platform — Uploading of a film without the consent of the rightholder — Proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 8 — Applicant’s right of information — Article 8(2)(a) — Definition of ‘addresses’ — Email address, IP address and telephone number — Not included)

cjeu_case ·