Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
33229

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#DQ and Others v Wallonische Region.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Road traffic – Registration and taxation of motor vehicles – Driver resident in one Member State – Vehicle registered in another Member State – Vehicle provided free of charge for a short period of time – Requirement to carry in the vehicle at all times evidence of the lawful use of that vehicle – Proportionality.#Joined Cases C-41/20 to C-43/20.

cjeu_case ·
33230

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#DQ and Others v Wallonische Region.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Road traffic – Registration and taxation of motor vehicles – Driver resident in one Member State – Vehicle registered in another Member State – Vehicle provided free of charge for a short period of time – Requirement to carry in the vehicle at all times evidence of the lawful use of that vehicle – Proportionality.#Joined Cases C-41/20 to C-43/20.

cjeu_case ·
33234

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#African Development Solutions (ADESO) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Grant contracts relating to the projects ‘Your Environment is Your Life’ and ‘Social Safety Net for Poor and Vulnerable Households in Northern Regions of Somalia/Somaliland Phase II’ – Non-eligible costs – Debit notes – Confirmation letter – Challengeable act – Contractual nature of the dispute – Act not open to challenge – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – Inadmissibility.#Case T-529/19.

cjeu_case ·
33235

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#African Development Solutions (ADESO) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Grant contracts relating to the projects ‘Your Environment is Your Life’ and ‘Social Safety Net for Poor and Vulnerable Households in Northern Regions of Somalia/Somaliland Phase II’ – Non-eligible costs – Debit notes – Confirmation letter – Challengeable act – Contractual nature of the dispute – Act not open to challenge – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – Inadmissibility.#Case T-529/19.

cjeu_case ·
33238

Case T-529/19: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2020 –ADESO v Commission (Action for annulment — Grant contracts relating to the projects ‘Your Environment is Your Life’ and ‘Social Safety Net for Poor and Vulnerable Households in Northern Regions of Somalia/Somaliland Phase II’ — Non-eligible costs — Debit notes — Confirmation letter — Challengeable act — Contractual nature of the dispute — Act not open to challenge — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
33239

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 septembre 2020.#A contre B et C.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Annexe, point 1, sous e) – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Logement social – Obligation de résider et interdiction de sous-louer le bien – Article 3, paragraphes 1 et 3 – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Appréciation du caractère éventuellement abusif des clauses pénales – Critères.#Affaire C-738/19.

cjeu_case ·
33240

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#A v B and C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Annex, point 1(e) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Social housing – Obligation of residence and prohibition on subletting the property – Article 3(1) and (3) – Article 4(1) – Assessment of whether penalty clauses are unfair – Criteria.#Case C-738/19.

cjeu_case ·