Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
3284

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Lav – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-564/24.

cjeu_case ·
3285

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Lav – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-564/24.

cjeu_case ·
3286

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Làv – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-563/24.

cjeu_case ·
3287

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Làv – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-563/24.

cjeu_case ·
3294

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#DI v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing a reprimand on a Member of the Parliament – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Procedural deadlines – Misuse of powers – Concept of ‘harassment’ – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment.#Case T-173/24.

cjeu_case ·
3296

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Piql AS v European Commission.#Grant agreement signed as part of the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Ultra-secure data storage and long-term preservation of digital and analogue data – Decision to recover part of the grant – Enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Article 110 of the EEA Agreement – Eligible costs – Article 122(2)(b) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 – Article 23(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Concepts of ‘linked third parties’ and ‘affiliated entities’ – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-158/24.

cjeu_case ·
3297

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Piql AS v European Commission.#Grant agreement signed as part of the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Ultra-secure data storage and long-term preservation of digital and analogue data – Decision to recover part of the grant – Enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Article 110 of the EEA Agreement – Eligible costs – Article 122(2)(b) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 – Article 23(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Concepts of ‘linked third parties’ and ‘affiliated entities’ – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-158/24.

cjeu_case ·
3298

Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 19 novembre 2025.#LGAI Technological Center, SA et jtsec Beyond IT Security, SL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour le programme spatial.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Services d’accréditation de sécurité – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE) 2021/696 – Programme spatial – Condition selon laquelle l’entité juridique éligible n’est pas soumise au contrôle d’un pays tiers ou d’une entité de pays tiers – Droit d’être entendu – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-41/24.

cjeu_case ·
3299

Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 19 novembre 2025.#LGAI Technological Center, SA et jtsec Beyond IT Security, SL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour le programme spatial.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Services d’accréditation de sécurité – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE) 2021/696 – Programme spatial – Condition selon laquelle l’entité juridique éligible n’est pas soumise au contrôle d’un pays tiers ou d’une entité de pays tiers – Droit d’être entendu – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-41/24.

cjeu_case ·