Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
32901

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#LSEZ SIA « Elme Messer Metalurgs » contre Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fonds structurels – Fonds européen de développement régional (FEDER) – Règlement (CE) no 1083/2006 – Article 2, point 7 – Notion d’“irrégularité” – Violation d’une disposition du droit de l’Union résultant d’un acte ou d’une omission d’un opérateur économique – Préjudice porté au budget général de l’Union européenne – Faillite du partenaire commercial unique du bénéficiaire.#Affaire C-743/18.

cjeu_case ·
32902

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#LSEZ SIA « Elme Messer Metalurgs » v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rēzeknes tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Structural Funds – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Article 2(7) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Infringement of a provision of EU law resulting from an act or omission on the part of an economic operator – Prejudice caused to the general budget of the European Union – Insolvency of the beneficiary’s sole business partner.#Case C-743/18.

cjeu_case ·
32903

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#A contre Daniel B e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Médicaments à usage humain non soumis à prescription médicale obligatoire – Vente en ligne – Publicité pour le site Internet d’une officine de pharmacie – Limitations – Interdictions de rabais en cas de commande dépassant une certaine quantité et de recours au référencement payant – Obligation de faire remplir un questionnaire de santé par le patient avant la validation de sa première commande sur le site Internet – Protection de la santé publique – Directive 2000/31/CE – Commerce électronique – Article 2, sous a) – Service de la société de l’information – Article 2, sous h) – Domaine coordonné – Article 3 – Principe du pays d’origine – Dérogations – Justification – Protection de la santé publique – Protection de la dignité de la profession de pharmacien – Prévention de la consommation abusive de médicaments.#Affaire C-649/18.

cjeu_case ·
32904

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#A v Daniel B and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use not subject to compulsory medical prescription – Online sales – Advertising for a pharmacy’s website – Limitations – Prohibition on discounts where the order exceeds certain amounts and the use of paid referencing – Obligation to require a patient to complete a health questionnaire prior to validation of his or her first order on a pharmacy’s website – Protection of public health – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 2(a) – Information society service – Article 2(h) – Coordinated field – Article 3 – Country-of-origin principle – Derogations – Justification – Protection of public health – Protection of the dignity of the profession of pharmacist – Prevention of the abusive consumption of medicinal products.#Case C-649/18.

cjeu_case ·
32905

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#Groupe Lactalis contre Premier ministre e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (UE) no 1169/2011 – Information des consommateurs sur les denrées alimentaires – Article 9, paragraphe 1, sous i), et article 26, paragraphe 2, sous a) – Mention obligatoire du pays d’origine ou du lieu de provenance des denrées alimentaires – Omission susceptible d’induire en erreur les consommateurs – Article 38, paragraphe 1 – Questions expressément harmonisées – Article 39, paragraphe 2 – Adoption de mesures nationales prévoyant des mentions obligatoires complémentaires concernant le pays d’origine ou le lieu de provenance de types ou de catégories spécifiques de denrées alimentaires – Conditions – Existence d’un lien avéré entre une ou plusieurs propriétés des denrées alimentaires concernées et leur origine ou leur provenance – Notions de “lien avéré” et de “propriétés” – Preuve que la majorité des consommateurs attache une importance significative à cette information – Mesure nationale prévoyant la mention obligatoire de l’origine nationale, européenne ou non européenne du lait.#Affaire C-485/18.

cjeu_case ·
32906

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Groupe Lactalis v Premier ministre and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Article 9(1)(i) and Article 26(2)(a) – Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods – Failure to indicate which might mislead the consumer – Article 38(1) – Matters specifically covered by the harmonisation – Article 39(2) – Adoption of national measures providing for additional mandatory particulars concerning the country of origin or place of provenance of specific types or categories of foods – Conditions – Existence of a proven link between one or several qualities of the foods concerned and their origin or provenance – Concepts of ‘proven link’ and ‘qualities’ – Evidence that the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of that information – National measure providing for the mandatory indication of the national, European or non-European origin of milk.#Case C-485/18.

cjeu_case ·
32907

Case C-743/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rēzeknes tiesa — Latvia) — LSEZ SIA ‘Elme Messer Metalurgs’ v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Structural Funds — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 — Article 2(7) — Concept of ‘irregularity’ — Infringement of a provision of EU law resulting from an act or omission on the part of an economic operator — Prejudice caused to the general budget of the European Union — Insolvency of the beneficiary’s sole business partner)

cjeu_case ·
32908

Case C-649/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — A v Daniel B, UD, AFP, B, L (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Medicinal products for human use not subject to compulsory medical prescription — Online sales — Advertising for a pharmacy’s website — Limitations — Prohibition on discounts where the order exceeds certain amounts and the use of paid referencing — Obligation to require a patient to complete a health questionnaire prior to validation of his or her first order on a pharmacy’s website — Protection of public health — Directive 2000/31/EC — Electronic commerce — Article 2(a) — Information society service — Article 2(h) — Coordinated field — Article 3 — Country-of-origin principle — Derogations — Justification — Protection of public health — Protection of the dignity of the profession of pharmacist — Prevention of the abusive consumption of medicinal products)

cjeu_case ·
32909

Case C-485/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Groupe Lactalis v Premier ministre, Garde des Sceaux, ministre de la Justice, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Provision of food information to consumers — Article 9(1)(i) and Article 26(2)(a) — Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods — Failure to indicate which might mislead the consumer — Article 38(1) — Matters specifically covered by the harmonisation — Article 39(2) — Adoption of national measures providing for additional mandatory particulars concerning the country of origin or place of provenance of specific types or categories of foods — Conditions — Existence of a proven link between one or several qualities of the foods concerned and their origin or provenance — Concepts of ‘proven link’ and ‘qualities’ — Evidence that the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of that information — National measure providing for the mandatory indication of the national, European or non-European origin of milk)

cjeu_case ·
32915

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-240/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32916

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-240/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32917

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-239/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32918

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-239/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32919

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2020.#JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts – Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts – Whether permissible.#Case C-135/20.

cjeu_case ·
32920

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2020.#JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts – Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts – Whether permissible.#Case C-135/20.

cjeu_case ·