3221Case C-756/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2025 by Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Case T-1105/23 Abramovich v Councilcjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3222Case C-754/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2025 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Joined Cases T-435/23 and T-224/24, YL v Council and EUIPOcjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3223Case C-747/25, Abazulgol: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du contentieux des étrangers (Belgium) lodged on 20 November 2025 – X v Commissaire générale aux réfugiés et aux apatridescjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3224Case C-746/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2025 by ClientEarth AISBL against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Case T-579/22, ClientEarth v Commissioncjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3225Case C-745/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2025 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Case T-58/24, Tiktok Technology v Commissioncjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3226Case C-744/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2025 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Case T-55/24, Meta Platforms Ireland v Commissioncjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3227Case C-741/25, Ranerski: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 20 November 2025 – MR v TMcjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3228Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#AA and Others v Migrationsverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Area of freedom, security and justice – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2001/55/EC – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons – Articles 17 and 19 – Concept of ‘application for asylum’ – Article 3(1) – Grant of subsidiary protection status to a person enjoying temporary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 18 – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2) – Direct effect.#Case C-195/25.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3229Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#AA and Others v Migrationsverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Area of freedom, security and justice – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2001/55/EC – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons – Articles 17 and 19 – Concept of ‘application for asylum’ – Article 3(1) – Grant of subsidiary protection status to a person enjoying temporary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 18 – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2) – Direct effect.#Case C-195/25.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3230Case C-195/25, Framholm: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg – Sweden) – AA, BA, CA, DA, EA, FA v Migrationsverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Area of freedom, security and justice – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2001/55/EC – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons – Articles 17 and 19 – Concept of application for asylum – Article 3(1) – Grant of subsidiary protection status to a person enjoying temporary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 18 – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2) – Direct effect)cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3231Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA – Cross-claim – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-545/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3232Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA – Cross-claim – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-545/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3233Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA SINCE 1940 – Cross-claim – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-544/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3234Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA SINCE 1940 – Cross-claim – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-544/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3235Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Siegfried PharmaChemikalien Minden GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 24(d) and Article 211(2) – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Empowerment to ‘supplement’ a legislative act – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Article 172(1) and (2) – Validity – Retroactive effect of an authorisation for inward processing.#Case C-617/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3236Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Siegfried PharmaChemikalien Minden GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 24(d) and Article 211(2) – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Power to ‘supplement’ a legislative act – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Article 172(1) and (2) – Validity – Retroactive effect of an inward processing authorisation.#Case C-617/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3237Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Transilvania Master Insolv IPURL, en tant d’administrateur judiciaire d’ Ecoserv SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 8(1)(a)(i) and (2) – Person liable to pay excise duty – Quantity of ethyl alcohol missing from a company’s business assets – Managing director of a company guilty of embezzlement and of a failure to make entries in the accounts – Determination of the person liable to pay excise duty – More than one person liable – Effect of a judgment of a criminal court delivered in respect of civil matters, finding the managing director solely liable.#Case C-570/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3238Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Transilvania Master Insolv IPURL, en tant d’administrateur judiciaire d’ Ecoserv SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 8(1)(a)(i) and (2) – Person liable to pay excise duty – Quantity of ethyl alcohol missing from a company’s business assets – Managing director of a company guilty of embezzlement and of a failure to make entries in the accounts – Determination of the person liable to pay excise duty – More than one person liable – Effect of a judgment of a criminal court delivered in respect of civil matters, finding the managing director solely liable.#Case C-570/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3239Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 20 novembre 2025.#Commission européenne contre République hellénique.#Manquement d’État – Article 258 TFUE – Directive (UE) 2018/958 – Évaluation par les États membres du caractère proportionné des réglementations nationales limitant l’accès aux professions réglementées ou leur exercice – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Champ d’application – Organismes nationaux compétents – Article 4, paragraphes 1 et 6 – Examen de proportionnalité ex ante et ex post ainsi que suivi des mesures nationales restrictives – Transposition incomplète.#Affaire C-518/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025
3240Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-518/24.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2025