Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
32369

Case T-163/20: Order of the General Court of 29 October 2020 — Isopix v Parliament (Action for annulment and for compensation — Public supply contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of photography services — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer — Cancellation of the procurement procedure — Action which has become, in part, devoid of purpose — No need, in part, to adjudicate — Order — Appeal in part brought before a court manifestly lacking in jurisdiction to hear it)

cjeu_case ·
32370

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-312/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32371

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-312/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32372

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-311/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32373

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-311/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32374

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-310/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32375

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-310/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32378

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-308/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32379

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-308/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32380

Order of the Court of 29 October 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-307/20 P.

cjeu_case ·