Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
32061

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 25 novembre 2020.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) contre WS.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2011/98/UE – Droits des travailleurs issus de pays tiers titulaires d’un permis unique – Article 12 – Droit à l’égalité de traitement – Sécurité sociale – Réglementation d’un État membre excluant, pour la détermination des droits à une prestation familiale, les membres de la famille du titulaire d’un permis unique qui ne résident pas sur le territoire de cet État membre.#Affaire C-302/19.

cjeu_case ·
32062

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale v WS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third country workers who hold single permits – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – Legislation of a Member State excluding, for the purposes of determining entitlement to a family benefit, the family members of the holder of a single permit who do not reside in the territory of that Member State.#Case C-302/19.

cjeu_case ·
32063

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 25 novembre 2020.#Banca B. SA contre A.A.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Conséquences de la constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause – Substitution de la clause abusive – Modalité de calcul du taux d’intérêt variable – Admissibilité – Renvoi des parties aux négociations.#Affaire C-269/19.

cjeu_case ·
32064

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Banca B. SA v A.A.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consequences of a term being found to be unfair – Replacement of the unfair term – Method for calculating the variable interest rate – Whether permissible – Referral of the parties to negotiations.#Case C-269/19.

cjeu_case ·
32065

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 25 novembre 2020.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Manquement d’État – Communications électroniques – Service universel et droits des utilisateurs au regard des réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/22/CE – Réseaux et services – Article 13 – Financement des obligations de service universel – Mécanisme de répartition – Principes de transparence, de distorsion minimale du marché, de non-discrimination et de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-49/19.

cjeu_case ·
32066

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Electronic communications – Universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/22/EC – Networks and services – Article 13 – Financing of universal service obligations – Sharing mechanism – Principles of transparency, least market distortion, non-discrimination and proportionality.#Case C-49/19.

cjeu_case ·
32067

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 25 November 2020.#XX v Tartu Vangla.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Article 2(2)(a) – Article 4(1) – Article 5 – National legislation laying down requirements in respect of the hearing acuity of prison officers – Failure to meet the standards of sound perception required – Absolute bar to remaining in employment.#Case C-795/19.

cjeu_case ·
32068

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 25 November 2020.#De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support scheme for farmers – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) – Direct payments – Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules – Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction – Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a).#Case C-361/19.

cjeu_case ·
32069

Case C-799/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Košice I — Slovakia) — NI, OJ, PK v Sociálna poisťovňa (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2008/94/EC — Articles 2 and 3 — Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer — Concepts of ‘employees’ outstanding claims’ and ‘insolvency of an employer’ — Accident at work — Death of the employee — Compensation for non-material damage — Recovery of the claim against the employer — Impossible — Guarantee institution)

cjeu_case ·
32070

Case C-372/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen — Belgium) — Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v BVBA Weareone.World, NV Wecandance (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Article 102 TFEU — Abuse of a dominant position — Concept of ‘unfair price’ — Copyright collecting society — De facto monopoly — Dominant position — Abuse — Performance of musical works during music festivals — Scale based on gross revenue from the sale of admission tickets — Reasonable in relation to the service provided by the collecting society — Determination of the share of the musical repertoire of the collecting society actually performed)

cjeu_case ·
32071

Case C-303/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale v VR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/109/EC — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Article 11 — Right to equal treatment — Social security — Legislation of a Member State excluding, for the determination of rights to a family benefit, the family members of a long-term resident who do not reside in the territory of that Member State)

cjeu_case ·
32072

Case C-302/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale v WS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/98/EU — Rights for third country workers who hold single permits — Article 12 — Right to equal treatment — Social security — Legislation of a Member State excluding, for the purposes of determining entitlement to a family benefit, the family members of the holder of a single permit who do not reside in the territory of that Member State)

cjeu_case ·
32073

Case C-269/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — Banca B. SA v A.A.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Consequences of a term being found to be unfair — Replacement of the unfair term — Method for calculating the variable interest rate — Whether permissible — Referral of the parties to negotiations)

cjeu_case ·
32074

Case C-49/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Electronic communications — Universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/22/EC — Networks and services — Article 13 — Financing of universal service obligations — Sharing mechanism — Principles of transparency, least market distortion, non-discrimination and proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
32075

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 25 novembre 2020.#Commission européenne contre GEA Group AG.#Pourvoi – Ententes – Marchés européens des stabilisants thermiques à base d’étain, d’huile de soja époxydée et d’esters – Fixation des prix, répartition des marchés et échange d’informations commerciales sensibles – Application du plafond de 10 % du chiffre d’affaires à l’une des entités composant l’entreprise – Annulation de la décision modifiant l’amende fixée dans la décision initiale de constatation de l’infraction – Amendes – Notion d’“entreprise” – Responsabilité solidaire pour le paiement de l’amende – Principe d’égalité de traitement – Date d’exigibilité de l’amende en cas de modification.#Affaire C-823/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
32076

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#European Commission v GEA Group AG.#Appeal – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European markets for tin-based heat stabilisers and for heat stabilisers with epoxised soybean oil and esters as their base – Price fixing, market allocation and exchange of commercially sensitive information – Application of the ceiling of 10% of turnover to one of the entities forming the undertaking – Annulment of the decision amending the fine imposed in the initial infringement decision – Fines – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Joint and several liability for payment of the fine – Principle of equal treatment – Date on which the fine is payable in the event of amendment.#Case C-823/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
32077

Case C-823/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 November 2020 — European Commission v GEA Group AG (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets for tin-based heat stabilisers and for heat stabilisers with epoxised soybean oil and esters as their base — Price fixing, market allocation and exchange of commercially sensitive information — Application of the ceiling of 10 % of turnover to one of the entities forming the undertaking — Annulment of the decision amending the fine imposed in the initial infringement decision — Fines — Concept of an ‘undertaking’ — Joint and several liability for payment of the fine — Principle of equal treatment — Date on which the fine is payable in the event of amendment)

cjeu_case ·