Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
32030

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Kisscolor Living GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark KISS COLOR – Earlier EU word mark KISS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Temporal application of the law.#Case T-802/19.

cjeu_case ·
32031

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Kisscolor Living GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark KISS COLOR – Earlier EU word mark KISS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Temporal application of the law.#Case T-802/19.

cjeu_case ·
32034

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SADIA – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-310/19.

cjeu_case ·
32035

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SADIA – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-310/19.

cjeu_case ·
32036

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Sadia – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-309/19.

cjeu_case ·
32037

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Sadia – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-309/19.

cjeu_case ·
32038

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Marco Bronckers v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks – Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-166/19.

cjeu_case ·
32039

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Marco Bronckers v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks – Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-166/19.

cjeu_case ·
32040

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Prohibition of the funding of a national political party – Contribution or donation by a national political party – Principle of sound administration – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100% of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Rights of defence.#Case T-107/19.

cjeu_case ·