Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
3161

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#SiLog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Si Log International – Earlier national word mark SILOG – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard.#Case T-572/24.

cjeu_case ·
3162

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#SiLog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Si Log International – Earlier national word mark SILOG – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard.#Case T-572/24.

cjeu_case ·
3167

Case T-690/24, Kolinsen: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 26 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof’s-Hertogenbosch – Netherlands) – Inspecteur van de Douane v FL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 10(2) and (4) of Directive 2008/118 – Occurrence of an irregularity during a movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Detection of the irregularity during the movement – Quantity of missing goods detected when unloading the means of transport)

cjeu_case ·
3168

Case T-657/24, Versãofast: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 26 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD) – Portugal) – Versãofast, Unipessoal, Lda. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of VAT – Article 135(1)(b) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions for other activities – Negotiation of credit – Activities of a credit intermediary – Classification)

cjeu_case ·
3170

Case T-608/24: Judgment of the Court of 26 November 2025 – Bazhaev v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of association – Error of assessment – Right to property – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
3171

Case T-607/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – SBK Art v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of association – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
3172

Case T-572/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – SiLog v EUIPO – Silog (Si Log International) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Si Log International – Earlier national word mark SILOG – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard)

cjeu_case ·
3174

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014.#Case T-524/22.

cjeu_case ·
3175

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014.#Case T-524/22.

cjeu_case ·
3176

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank banka – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014.#Case T-523/22.

cjeu_case ·
3177

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank banka – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014.#Case T-523/22.

cjeu_case ·
3178

Case T-524/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – MeSoFa v Commission and SRB (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014)

cjeu_case ·
3179

Case T-523/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – MeSoFa v Commission and SRB (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank banka – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014)

cjeu_case ·