Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
31001

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Second indent of Article 239(1) – Reimbursement of lawfully collected customs duties – Special situation – Issuance of an authorisation for release for free circulation – Invalidation of the authorisation and issue of an authorisation for inward processing with retroactive effect – Re-exporting goods outside of the EU territory – Failure to present goods to customs.#Case C-92/20.

cjeu_case ·
31002

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Second indent of Article 239(1) – Reimbursement of lawfully collected customs duties – Special situation – Issuance of an authorisation for release for free circulation – Invalidation of the authorisation and issue of an authorisation for inward processing with retroactive effect – Re-exporting goods outside of the EU territory – Failure to present goods to customs.#Case C-92/20.

cjeu_case ·
31003

Case C-92/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union — Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Second indent of Article 239(1) — Reimbursement of lawfully collected customs duties — Special situation — Issuance of an authorisation for release for free circulation — Invalidation of the authorisation and issue of an authorisation for inward processing with retroactive effect — Re-exporting goods outside of the EU territory — Failure to present goods to customs)

cjeu_case ·
31004

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-124/19.

cjeu_case ·
31005

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-124/19.

cjeu_case ·
31006

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-123/19.

cjeu_case ·
31007

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-123/19.

cjeu_case ·
31008

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-122/19.

cjeu_case ·
31009

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-122/19.

cjeu_case ·
31010

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-121/19.

cjeu_case ·
31011

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-121/19.

cjeu_case ·
31012

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-120/19.

cjeu_case ·
31013

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-120/19.

cjeu_case ·
31014

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-119/19.

cjeu_case ·
31015

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-119/19.

cjeu_case ·
31016

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-118/19.

cjeu_case ·
31017

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-118/19.

cjeu_case ·
31018

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Right to property – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-116/19.

cjeu_case ·
31019

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Right to property – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-116/19.

cjeu_case ·
31020

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-113/19.

cjeu_case ·