Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
3083

Order of the Court of 2 December 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-432/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
3084

Order of the Court of 2 December 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-432/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
3090

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025.#Stichting Right to Consumer Justice and Stichting App Stores Claims v Apple Distribution International Ltd and Apple Inc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Determination of the territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State – Place where the harmful event occurred – Place where the damage occurred – Representative action seeking compensation for the damage caused by anticompetitive conduct consisting of the charging by the operator of an online platform, aimed at all users in a Member State, of excessive commission on the price of applications and digital products offered for sale on that platform – Action brought by an entity qualified to defend the collective interests of multiple unidentified but identifiable users.#Case C-34/24.

cjeu_case ·
3091

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025.#Stichting Right to Consumer Justice and Stichting App Stores Claims v Apple Distribution International Ltd and Apple Inc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Determination of the territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State – Place where the harmful event occurred – Place where the damage occurred – Representative action seeking compensation for the damage caused by anticompetitive conduct consisting of the charging by the operator of an online platform, aimed at all users in a Member State, of excessive commission on the price of applications and digital products offered for sale on that platform – Action brought by an entity qualified to defend the collective interests of multiple unidentified but identifiable users.#Case C-34/24.

cjeu_case ·
3092

Case C-34/24, Stichting Right to Consumer Justice and Stichting App Stores Claims: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Amsterdam – Netherlands) – Stichting Right to Consumer Justice, Stichting App Stores Claims v Apple Distribution International Ltd, Apple Inc. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Determination of the territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State – Place where the harmful event occurred – Place where the damage occurred – Representative action seeking compensation for the damage caused by anticompetitive conduct consisting of the charging by the operator of an online platform, aimed at all users in a Member State, of excessive commission on the price of applications and digital products offered for sale on that platform – Action brought by an entity qualified to defend the collective interests of multiple unidentified but identifiable users)

cjeu_case ·
3093

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025.#X v Russmedia Digital SRL and Inform Media Press SRL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Responsibility of the operator of an online marketplace for the publication of personal data contained in advertisements placed on its online marketplace by user advertisers – Article 5(2) – Principle of accountability – Article 26 – Joint control with user advertisers – Article 9(1) and (2)(a) – Advertisements containing sensitive data – Lawfulness of processing – Consent – Articles 24, 25 and 32 – Obligations of the controller – Prior identification of the advertisements containing such data – Prior identification of the identity of the user advertiser – Refusal of publication of unlawful advertisements – Security measures such as to prevent the copying of advertisements and their publication on other websites – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Articles 12 to 15 – Possibility for such an operator, with regard to an infringement of those obligations, to rely on the exemption from liability of an intermediary information society service provider.#Case C-492/23.

cjeu_case ·
3094

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025.#X v Russmedia Digital SRL and Inform Media Press SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Responsibility of the operator of an online marketplace for the publication of personal data contained in advertisements placed on its online marketplace by user advertisers – Article 5(2) – Principle of accountability – Article 26 – Joint control with user advertisers – Article 9(1) and (2)(a) – Advertisements containing sensitive data – Lawfulness of processing – Consent – Articles 24, 25 and 32 – Obligations of the controller – Prior identification of the advertisements containing such data – Prior identification of the identity of the user advertiser – Refusal of publication of unlawful advertisements – Security measures such as to prevent the copying of advertisements and their publication on other websites – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Articles 12 to 15 – Possibility for such an operator, with regard to an infringement of those obligations, to rely on the exemption from liability of an intermediary information society service provider.#Case C-492/23.

cjeu_case ·
3095

Case C-492/23, Russmedia Digital and Inform Media Press: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj – Romania) – X v Russmedia Digital SRL, Inform Media Press SRL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of controller – Responsibility of the operator of an online marketplace for the publication of personal data contained in advertisements placed on its online marketplace by user advertisers – Article 5(2) – Principle of accountability – Article 26 – Joint control with user advertisers – Article 9(1) and (2)(a) – Advertisements containing sensitive data – Lawfulness of processing – Consent – Articles 24, 25 and 32 – Obligations of the controller – Prior identification of the advertisements containing such data – Prior identification of the identity of the user advertiser – Refusal of publication of unlawful advertisements – Security measures such as to prevent the copying of advertisements and their publication on other websites – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Articles 12 to 15 – Possibility for such an operator, with regard to an infringement of those obligations, to rely on the exemption from liability of an intermediary information society service provider)

cjeu_case ·