3041Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 December 2025.#Mio AB and Others v Galleri Mikael & Thomas Asplund Aktiebolag and USM U. Schärer Söhne AG.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt and Bundesgerichtshof.#References for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 – Reproduction right – Concept of ‘work’ – Copyright protection of works of applied art – Assessment of the originality of subject matter of applied art – Concept of ‘free and creative choices’ – Criteria for the assessment of those choices – Assessment of the infringement of exclusive rights.#Joined Cases C-580/23 and C-795/23.cjeu_case · 4 décembre 2025
3042Joined Cases C-580/23 and C-795/23, Mio and Others: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen and Bundesgerichtshof – Sweden, Germany) – Mio AB, Mio e-handel AB, Mio Försäljning AB (C-580/23), USM U. Schärer Söhne AG (C-795/23) v Galleri Mikael & Thomas Asplund Aktiebolag (C-580/23), konektra GmbH, LN (C-795/23) (References for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 – Reproduction right – Concept of work – Copyright protection of works of applied art – Assessment of the originality of subject matter of applied art – Concept of free and creative choices – Criteria for the assessment of those choices – Assessment of the infringement of exclusive rights)cjeu_case · 4 décembre 2025
3043Case T-827/25: Action brought on 3 December 2025 – Cobra Golf v EUIPO (ULTRADRY)cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3044Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Mute Sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark mute labs – Earlier EU figurative mark MuteDesign – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-49/25.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3045Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Mute Sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark mute labs – Earlier EU figurative mark MuteDesign – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-49/25.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3046Case T-49/25: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2025 – Mute v EUIPO – mute-labs (mute labs) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark mute labs – Earlier EU figurative mark MuteDesign – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3047Case C-776/25, AVG Altersvorsorge: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 3 December 2025 – AVG Altersvorsorge Genossenschaft eG i.L. v LScjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3048Case C-184/25, Mercedes-Benz Group: Order of the President of the Court of 3 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Duisburg – Germany) – RH v Mercedes-Benz Group AGcjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3049Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 3 December 2025.#MS KLJUČAROVCI, d. o. o. - v stečaju v Republic of Slovenia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of VAT – Articles 41 and 42 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Place of an intra-Community acquisition of goods – Article 141(c) of Directive 2006/112 – Triangular transaction – Simplification measure – Chain of supplies comprising four operators identified in three different Member States – Taxable person who is or should have been aware of transactions constituting an abuse of the VAT system.#Case T-646/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3050Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 3 December 2025.#MS KLJUČAROVCI, d. o. o. - v stečaju v Republic of Slovenia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of VAT – Articles 41 and 42 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Place of an intra-Community acquisition of goods – Article 141(c) of Directive 2006/112 – Triangular transaction – Simplification measure – Chain of supplies comprising four operators identified in three different Member States – Taxable person who is or should have been aware of transactions constituting an abuse of the VAT system.#Case T-646/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3051Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Nokia Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark NOOKA YOUR SPACE – Earlier EU word mark NOKIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-617/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3052Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Nokia Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark NOOKA YOUR SPACE – Earlier EU word mark NOKIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-617/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3053Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2025 (Extracts).#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of association with a person or entity subject to restrictive measures – Fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad – Error of assessment.#Case T-414/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3054Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2025 (Extracts).#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of association with a person or entity subject to restrictive measures – Fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad – Error of assessment.#Case T-414/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3055Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2025 (Extracts).#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of association with a person or entity subject to restrictive measures – Fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad – Error of assessment.#Case T-414/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3056Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#WS v European Commission.#Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Requests made to EPSO concerning access to and processing of personal data – Error of law.#Cases T-318/24 and T-362/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3057Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#WS v European Commission.#Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Requests made to EPSO concerning access to and processing of personal data – Error of law.#Cases T-318/24 and T-362/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3058Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to be heard – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Right to property – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-285/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3059Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Case T-285/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025
3060Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#UC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Action for annulment – Competence of the Council – Obligation of transparency – Legal certainty – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality.#Case T-72/24.cjeu_case · 3 décembre 2025