30501Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Hauz 1929 Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ LONDON – Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-66/20.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30502Case T-99/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Golvabia Innovation v EUIPO (MaxWear) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark MaxWear — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30503Case T-71/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — CAMäleon (PUMA-System) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark PUMA-System — Earlier EU figurative marks PUMA — Relative ground for refusal — Detriment to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30504Case T-68/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ EST 1929) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ EST 1929 — Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30505Case T-67/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ NEW YORK) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ NEW YORK — Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30506Case T-66/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ LONDON) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ LONDON — Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30507Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 10 mars 2021.#PI.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Mandat d’arrêt européen émis par le parquet d’un État membre aux fins de poursuites pénales sur la base d’une mesure privative de liberté émise par la même autorité – Absence du contrôle juridictionnel avant la remise de la personne recherchée – Conséquences – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-648/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30508Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#PI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Westminster Magistrates’ Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of a criminal prosecution on the basis of a detention order issued by the same authority – No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person – Consequences – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-648/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30509Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ordine Nazionale dei Biologi and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Article 168 TFEU – Directive 2002/98/EC – Standards of quality and safety of human blood and of blood components – Objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human health – Article 4(2) and Article 9(2) – Blood establishments – Responsible person – Minimum conditions of qualification – Option for a Member State to provide for a more stringent regime – Discretion afforded to the Member States.#Case C-96/20.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30510Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ordine Nazionale dei Biologi and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Article 168 TFEU – Directive 2002/98/EC – Standards of quality and safety of human blood and of blood components – Objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human health – Article 4(2) and Article 9(2) – Blood establishments – Responsible person – Minimum conditions of qualification – Option for a Member State to provide for a more stringent regime – Discretion afforded to the Member States.#Case C-96/20.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30511Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 10 March 2021.#Top System SA v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Legal protection of computer programs – Directive 91/250/EEC – Article 5 – Exceptions to the restricted acts – Acts necessary to enable the lawful purchaser to correct errors – Concept – Article 6 – Decompilation – Conditions.#Case C-13/20.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30512Case C-648/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from Westminster Magistrates’ Court — United Kingdom) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against PI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 8(1)(c) — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of a criminal prosecution on the basis of a detention order issued by the same authority — No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person — Consequences — Effective judicial protection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30513Case C-96/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Ordine Nazionale dei Biologi, MX, NY, OZ v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — Article 168 TFEU — Directive 2002/98/EC — Standards of quality and safety of human blood and of blood components — Objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human health — Article 4(2) and Article 9(2) — Blood establishments — Responsible person — Minimum conditions of qualification — Option for a Member State to provide for a more stringent regime — Discretion afforded to the Member States)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30514Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#FI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Surviving spouse – Survivor’s pension – Articles 18, 19 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Conditions for eligibility – Duration of the marriage – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Case T-694/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30515Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#FI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Surviving spouse – Survivor’s pension – Articles 18, 19 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Conditions for eligibility – Duration of the marriage – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Case T-694/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30516Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark KERRYMAID – Earlier EU figurative mark Kerrygold – Relative ground for refusal – Geographical name – Dominant element – Peaceful coexistence – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Application of the law ratione temporis.#Case T-693/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30517Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark KERRYMAID – Earlier EU figurative mark Kerrygold – Relative ground for refusal – Geographical name – Dominant element – Peaceful coexistence – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Application of the law ratione temporis.#Case T-693/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30518Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#AM v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Remuneration – Admissibility – Time limit for submitting a request to initiate the conciliation procedure – Act adversely affecting an official – Geographical mobility allowance – Transfer to an external office – Refusal to grant the allowance – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case T-134/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30519Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#AM v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Remuneration – Admissibility – Time limit for submitting a request to initiate the conciliation procedure – Act adversely affecting an official – Geographical mobility allowance – Transfer to an external office – Refusal to grant the allowance – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case T-134/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30520Case T-739/19: Order of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Productos Jamaica v EUIPO — Alada 1850 (flordeJamaica) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021