Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
30344

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 March 2021.#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue of law is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-639/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
30345

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 March 2021.#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue of law is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-639/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
30346

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2021.#Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark – Norway – Sweden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Pilots’ strike organised within a legal framework – Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity – Articles 16, 17 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No impairment of the air carrier’s freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right of negotiation.#Case C-28/20.

cjeu_case ·
30347

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2021.#Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark – Norway – Sweden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Attunda tingsrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Pilots’ strike organised within a legal framework – Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity – Articles 16, 17 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No impairment of the air carrier’s freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right of negotiation.#Case C-28/20.

cjeu_case ·
30348

Case C-28/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Attunda tingsrätt — Sweden) — Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Pilots’ strike organised within a legal framework — Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity — Articles 16, 17 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — No impairment of the air carrier’s freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right of negotiation)

cjeu_case ·
30356

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 22 March 2021.#X v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 13(2) – Right of residence of family members of a Union citizen – Marriage between a Union citizen and a third-country national – Retention, in the event of divorce, of the right of residence by a third-country national who is the victim of acts of domestic violence committed by his or her spouse – Requirement to demonstrate the existence of sufficient resources – No such requirement in Directive 2003/86/EC – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 20 and 21 – Equal treatment – Difference in treatment based on whether the sponsor is a Union citizen or a third-country national – Non-comparability of situations.#Case C-930/19.

cjeu_case ·