2981Case T-458/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Ryanair v Commission (TAP; restructuring aid) (State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Restructuring aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS and TAP Air Portugal – Commission decision authorising aid under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2025
2982Case T-914/25, Modelo Continente Hipermercados: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) made on 9 December 2025 – Modelo Continente Hipermercados S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneiracjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2984Case T-850/25: Action brought on 9 December 2025 – OB and Others v EEAScjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2986Case T-842/25: Action brought on 9 December 2025 – ARS Pharmaceuticals v EMAcjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2987Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#DR v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Dismissal following a conflict of interest – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 11 – Principle of sound administration – Protection of personal data – Rejection of a complaint challenging the refusal to compensate the applicant – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-450/25 P.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2988Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#DR v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Dismissal following a conflict of interest – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 11 – Principle of sound administration – Protection of personal data – Rejection of a complaint challenging the refusal to compensate the applicant – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-450/25 P.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2989Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#ER v Miskolci Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(b) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-220/25.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2990Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#ER v Miskolci Törvényszék.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(b) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-220/25.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2991Case C-828/25, Szuzyk: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Tomaszowie Mazowieckim (Poland) lodged on 9 December 2025 – J.J., M.J. v BNP P. Bank Polska S.A.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2992Case C-802/25: Action brought on 9 December 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of Spaincjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2993Case C-801/25, Kerdos Investment: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 9 December 2025 – Kerdos Investment-AG TGV v Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsichtcjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2994Case C-799/25, Hochtief Europe Magyarországi Fióktelepe: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Hungary) lodged on 9 December 2025 – Hochtief Europe GmbH Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Győri Ítélőtáblacjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2995Case C-798/25, MV-expo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 9 December 2025 – MV-expo, s.r.o. v IMMIX spol. s r. o.cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2996Case C-220/25, Miskolci Törvényszék: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék – Hungary) – ER v Miskolci Törvényszék (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(b) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 9 décembre 2025
2997Case T-846/25: Action brought on 8 December 2025 – Consorzio per la tutela e la valorizzazione della Burrata di Andria IGP v EUIPO – La Marca (BURRATA CAMPANA)cjeu_case · 8 décembre 2025
2999Case T-838/25: Action brought on 8 December 2025 – Decibel – RF Living DZZD v Parliamentcjeu_case · 8 décembre 2025
3000Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 December 2025.#J.L.Q. v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to indicate the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient detail – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-403/25.cjeu_case · 8 décembre 2025