29921Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark APO – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-282/20.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29922Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Chanel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves – Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-44/20.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29923Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Chanel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves – Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-44/20.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29924Case T-382/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Lee v EUIPO (Table knives, forks and spoons) (Community design — Application for a Community design representing table knives, forks and spoons — Lack of priority claim — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 67(1) and (2) Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Duty of due care)cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29925Case T-345/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Robert Klingel v EUIPO (MEN+) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29926Case T-326/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Bibita Group v EUIPO — Benkomers (Beverage bottles) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle — Prior international design — Ground for invalidity — Conflict with a prior design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29927Case T-323/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hell Energy Magyarország v EUIPO (HELL) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark HELL — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29928Case T-282/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (APO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark APO — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29929Case T-44/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Chanel v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (Representation of a circle containing two interlaced curves) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves — Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29930Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 April 2021.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MONOPOLY – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-663/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29931Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 April 2021.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MONOPOLY – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-663/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29932Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-555/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29933Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-555/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29934Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Intering Sh.p.k and Others v European Commission.#Public contracts – Tendering procedure – Reduction of dust and nitrogen oxide emissions at the Kosovo B thermal power plant, Units B1 and B2 – Rejection of the application – Application for annulment submitted in the reply – New claims – Manifest inadmissibility – Amendment of the selection criteria during the procedure – Equal treatment.#Case T-525/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29935Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Intering Sh.p.k and Others v European Commission.#Public contracts – Tendering procedure – Reduction of dust and nitrogen oxide emissions at the Kosovo B thermal power plant, Units B1 and B2 – Rejection of the application – Application for annulment submitted in the reply – New claims – Manifest inadmissibility – Amendment of the selection criteria during the procedure – Equal treatment.#Case T-525/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29936Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-322/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29937Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-322/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29938Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Laurent Pech v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Protection of legal advice – First subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Protection of the decision-making process – Refusal to grant full access to a legal opinion of the Council’s Legal Service.#Case T-252/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29939Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Laurent Pech v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Protection of legal advice – First subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Protection of the decision-making process – Refusal to grant full access to a legal opinion of the Council’s Legal Service.#Case T-252/19.cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021
29940Case T-663/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hasbro v EUIPO — Kreativni Događaji (MONOPOLY) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MONOPOLY — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 avril 2021