Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
29861

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 April 2021.#Centre d’Enseignement Secondaire Saint-Vincent de Soignies ASBL v FS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Maximum weekly working time – Reference period – Article 16 – Derogations – Articles 17 and 18 – Supervisor-teacher at a boarding school undertaking night duty – Compensatory rest conditions.#Case C-471/20.

cjeu_case ·
29862

Case C-471/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons — Belgium) — Centre d’Enseignement Secondaire Saint-Vincent de Soignies ASBL v FS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Maximum weekly working time — Reference period — Article 16 — Derogations — Articles 17 and 18 — Supervisor-teacher at a boarding school undertaking night duty — Compensatory rest conditions)

cjeu_case ·
29871

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#NT and Others v British Airways plc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(b) and Article 7(1) – Compensation for long delays at the final destination of a connecting flight – Connecting flight with several flight segments – Single booking – Cancellation of a flight segment by a carrier other than the one with which the single booking was made – Operating air carrier – Distance to be taken into account for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation.#Case C-592/20.

cjeu_case ·
29872

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#NT and Others v British Airways plc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(b) and Article 7(1) – Compensation for long delays at the final destination of a connecting flight – Connecting flight with several flight segments – Single booking – Cancellation of a flight segment by a carrier other than the one with which the single booking was made – Operating air carrier – Distance to be taken into account for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation.#Case C-592/20.

cjeu_case ·
29873

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#UAB „Lifosa“ v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 29(1) – Article 32(1)(e)(i) – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 70(1) – Article 71(1)(e)(i) – Determination of the customs value – Transaction value – Adjustment – Price including delivery at the border.#Case C-75/20.

cjeu_case ·
29874

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#UAB „Lifosa“ v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 29(1) – Article 32(1)(e)(i) – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 70(1) – Article 71(1)(e)(i) – Determination of the customs value – Transaction value – Adjustment – Price including delivery at the border.#Case C-75/20.

cjeu_case ·
29875

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 22 avril 2021.#ZM contre E. A. Frerichs.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (CE) no 1346/2000 – Procédures d’insolvabilité – Article 4 – Loi applicable à la procédure d’insolvabilité – Loi de l’État membre sur le territoire duquel la procédure est ouverte – Article 13 – Actes préjudiciables à l’ensemble des créanciers – Exception – Conditions – Acte soumis à la loi d’un État membre autre que l’État d’ouverture – Acte inattaquable sur le fondement de cette loi – Règlement (CE) no 593/2008 – Loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles – Article 12, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Domaine de la loi du contrat – Exécution des obligations engendrées par celui-ci – Paiement effectué en exécution d’un contrat soumis à la loi d’un État membre autre que l’État d’ouverture – Exécution par un tiers – Action en restitution de ce paiement dans le cadre d’une procédure d’insolvabilité – Loi applicable audit paiement.#Affaire C-73/20.

cjeu_case ·
29876

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#ZM v E. A. Frerichs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 – Insolvency proceedings – Article 4 – Law applicable to insolvency proceedings – Law of the Member State within the territory of which the proceedings are opened – Article 13 – Acts detrimental to all the creditors – Exception – Conditions – Act subject to the law of a Member State other than the State of the opening of proceedings – Act which is not open to challenge on the basis of that law – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Article 12(1)(b) – Scope of the law applicable to the contract – Performance of the obligations arising from the contract – Payment made in performance of a contract subject to the law of a Member State other than the State of the opening of proceedings – Performance by a third party – Action for repayment of that payment in insolvency proceedings – Law applicable to that payment.#Case C-73/20.

cjeu_case ·
29877

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 22 April 2021.#DG and EH v SC Gruber Logistics SRL and Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi v SC Samidani Trans SRL.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Articles 3 and 8 – Choice of law by the parties – Individual employment contracts – Employees who perform work in more than one Member State – Existence of closer connections with a country other than that in which or from which the employee habitually carries out his or her work or in which the place of business through which the employee was engaged is situated – Concept of ‘provisions which cannot be derogated from by agreement’ – Minimum wage.#Joined Cases C-152/20 and C-218/20.

cjeu_case ·
29878

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 22 April 2021.#Republiken Polen v PL Holdings Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium and the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, of the one part, and the Government of the People’s Republic of Poland, of the other, concerning the reciprocal promotion and protection of investments, signed on 19 May 1987 – Arbitration proceedings – Dispute between an investor from one Member State and another Member State – Arbitration clause provided for in that agreement contrary to EU law – Invalidity – Ad hoc arbitration agreement between the parties to that dispute – Participation in the arbitration proceedings – Tacit expression by that other Member State of its intention to conclude that arbitration agreement – Unlawfulness.#Case C-109/20.

cjeu_case ·
29879

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 22 April 2021.#Wilo Salmson France SAS v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti - Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167 to 171 and Article 178(a) – Right to deduct VAT – Refund of VAT to taxable persons established in a Member State other than the Member State of refund – Holding of an invoice – Directive 2008/9/EC – Refusal of the refund application – ‘Cancellation’ of the invoice by the supplier – Issuing of a new invoice – New refund application – Refusal.#Case C-80/20.

cjeu_case ·
29880

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 22 April 2021.#RH v AB Volvo and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the damage occurred – Cartel declared contrary to Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Determination of international and territorial jurisdiction – Centralisation of jurisdiction in favour of a specialised court.#Case C-30/20.

cjeu_case ·