Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
29821

Case T-615/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Point Tec Products Electronic v EUIPO — Compagnie des montres Longines, Francillon (representation of two extended wings around a triangle) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing two extended wings around a triangle — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 72(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
29823

Case T-509/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark FLÜGEL — Earlier national word marks … VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL — Relative grounds for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 70(2) and Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
29824

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe „Primart” Marek Łukasiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz – Earlier national word marks PRIMA – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Referral.#Case T-584/17 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
29826

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#repowermap.org v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark REPOWER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) – Freedom of expression.#Case T-872/16.

cjeu_case ·
29827

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#repowermap.org v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark REPOWER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) – Freedom of expression.#Case T-872/16.

cjeu_case ·
29828

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Repower AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark REPOWER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-842/16.

cjeu_case ·
29829

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Repower AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark REPOWER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-842/16.

cjeu_case ·
29831

Case T-872/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — repowermap.org v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Freedom of expression)

cjeu_case ·
29832

Case T-842/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Repower v EUIPO — repowermap.org (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
29839

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2021 (Extracts).#Roberto Alejandro Macías Chávez and Others v Kingdom of Spain and European Parliament.#Action for failure to act and for damages – Institutional law – Parliament’s Committee on Petitions – Petition concerning the infringement by the Spanish courts of EU law in the field of fundamental rights – Decision to declare the petition closed – Article 28 of the Rules of Procedure – Request for referral to a Chamber sitting in extended composition – Action in part brought before a court or tribunal manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-719/20.

cjeu_case ·
29840

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2021 (Extracts).#Roberto Alejandro Macías Chávez and Others v Kingdom of Spain and European Parliament.#Action for failure to act and for damages – Institutional law – Parliament’s Committee on Petitions – Petition concerning the infringement by the Spanish courts of EU law in the field of fundamental rights – Decision to declare the petition closed – Article 28 of the Rules of Procedure – Request for referral to a Chamber sitting in extended composition – Action in part brought before a court or tribunal manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-719/20.

cjeu_case ·