Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
29809

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Refusal to regrade – Action for annulment – Time limit for complaints – Burden of proving expiry of the time limit – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Action for damages – Non-material damage.#Case T-843/19.

cjeu_case ·
29810

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Refusal to regrade – Action for annulment – Time limit for complaints – Burden of proving expiry of the time limit – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Action for damages – Non-material damage.#Case T-843/19.

cjeu_case ·
29811

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Linde Material Handling GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VertiLight – Earlier national word mark VERTI – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – No link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/19.

cjeu_case ·
29812

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Linde Material Handling GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VertiLight – Earlier national word mark VERTI – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – No link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/19.

cjeu_case ·
29813

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Point Tec Products Electronic GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two extended wings around a triangle – Earlier EU figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-615/19.

cjeu_case ·
29814

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Point Tec Products Electronic GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two extended wings around a triangle – Earlier EU figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-615/19.

cjeu_case ·
29817

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FLÜGEL – Earlier national word marks …VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL – Relative grounds for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 70(2) and Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-509/19.

cjeu_case ·
29818

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FLÜGEL – Earlier national word marks …VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL – Relative grounds for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 70(2) and Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-509/19.

cjeu_case ·