Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
29401

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 May 2021.#TrekStor Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Breeze – Earlier EU word mark Breeze – Relative ground for refusal – Comparison of the goods – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-158/20.

cjeu_case ·
29403

Case T-158/20: Order of the General Court of 21 May 2021 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Yuneec Europe (Breeze) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Breeze — Earlier EU word mark Breeze — Relative ground for refusal — Comparison of the goods — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
29411

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 20 May 2021.#easyCosmetic Swiss GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-93/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
29412

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 20 May 2021.#easyCosmetic Swiss GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-93/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
29416

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#Criminal proceedings against ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Fundamental rights – Ne bis in idem principle – Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts – Cold calling – Misleading commercial practice – Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-88/20.

cjeu_case ·
29417

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#Criminal proceedings against ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Fundamental rights – Ne bis in idem principle – Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts – Cold calling – Misleading commercial practice – Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-88/20.

cjeu_case ·
29418

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#AAS „BTA Baltic Insurance Company” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 2 913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 195 – Article 232(1)(a) – Article 221(3) – Common Customs Tariff – Recovery of the amount of the customs debt – Communication of the amount of duty to the debtor – Limitation period – Action taken against the guarantor to enforce the guarantee – Enforcement for the purposes of payment – Reasonable period.#Case C-230/20.

cjeu_case ·
29419

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#AAS „BTA Baltic Insurance Company” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 2 913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 195 – Article 232(1)(a) – Article 221(3) – Common Customs Tariff – Recovery of the amount of the customs debt – Communication of the amount of duty to the debtor – Limitation period – Action taken against the guarantor to enforce the guarantee – Enforcement for the purposes of payment – Reasonable period.#Case C-230/20.

cjeu_case ·
29420

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#Renesola UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Assessment of validity – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1357/2013 – Determination of the country of origin of solar modules assembled in a third country from solar cells manufactured in another third country – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 24 – Origin of goods whose production involved more than one third country – Concept of ‘last substantial processing or working’.#Case C-209/20.

cjeu_case ·