29301Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 June 2021.#Style & Taste, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a polo player – Earlier national design – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 52(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-169/19.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29302Case T-856/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Franz Schröder v EUIPO — RDS Design (MONTANA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark MONTANA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29303Case T-855/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Franz Schröder v EUIPO — RDS Design (MONTANA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark MONTANA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29304Case T-854/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Franz Schröder v EUIPO — RDS Design (MONTANA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MONTANA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29305Case T-169/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Style & Taste v EUIPO — The Polo/Lauren Company (Representation of a polo player) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a polo player — Earlier national design — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 52(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29306Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid and Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5(1) ‐ Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ – Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ – Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff – Permanent need for temporary regulated staff.#Case C-103/19.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29307Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid and Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5(1) ‐ Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ – Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ – Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff – Permanent need for temporary regulated staff.#Case C-103/19.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29308Case C-103/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 24 de Madrid — Spain) — Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid, Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5(1) — Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector — Concept of ‘objective reasons’ — Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ — Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff — Permanent need for temporary regulated staff)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29309Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.#State aid – Healthcare services – Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of economic activity.#Case T-223/18.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29310Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.#State aid – Healthcare services – Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of economic activity.#Case T-223/18.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29311Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of Open Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of financial economics and macroeconomics – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competition to three languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-71/18.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29312Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of Open Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of financial economics and macroeconomics – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competition to three languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-71/18.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29313Case T-223/18: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v Commission (State aid — Healthcare services — Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Action for annulment — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of economic activity)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29314Case T-71/18: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Italy v Commission (Rules on languages — Notice of Open Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of financial economics and macroeconomics — Knowledge of languages — Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competition to three languages — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination based on language — Interests of the service — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29315Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of Open Competitions for the recruitment of administrators and assistants in the buildings sector – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competitions to three languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-718/17.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29316Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of Open Competitions for the recruitment of administrators and assistants in the buildings sector – Knowledge of languages – Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competitions to three languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-718/17.cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29317Case T-436/17: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (REACH — Commission decision granting an authorisation for some uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and of lead chromate molybdate sulfate red — Article 64 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Internal review of a marketing authorisation decision — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29318Case T-718/17: Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Italy v Commission (Rules on languages — Notice of Open Competitions for the recruitment of administrators and assistants in the buildings sector — Knowledge of languages — Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competitions to three languages — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination based on language — Interests of the service — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 2 juin 2021
29320Case T-308/21: Action brought on 1 June 2021 — Classen Holz Kontor v EUIPO — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer (new type tiling DRYTILE)cjeu_case · 1 juin 2021