29121Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-302/19.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29122Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2021 (Extracts).#Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreements concluded under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Policy Support Programme – Audit report – Debit notes issued by the Commission – OLAF investigation – Action for annulment – Counterclaim – Full repayment of grants – Damages.#Case T-235/19.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29123Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Exxonmobil Petroleum & Chemical BVBA v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Inclusion of phenanthrene on that list – Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Weight of evidence determination – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-177/19.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29124Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Exxonmobil Petroleum & Chemical BVBA v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Inclusion of phenanthrene on that list – Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Weight of evidence determination – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-177/19.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29125Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 June 2021.#Dansk Erhverv v European Commission.#State aid – Sale of canned beverages in border shops in Germany to foreign residents – Exemption from the deposit on condition that the beverages purchased are consumed outside Germany – Complaint – Decision by the Commission not to raise objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure – Error of law – Serious difficulties – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Non-imposition of a fine.#Case T-47/19.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29126Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 June 2021.#Dansk Erhverv v European Commission.#State aid – Sale of canned beverages in border shops in Germany to foreign residents – Exemption from the deposit on condition that the beverages purchased are consumed outside Germany – Complaint – Decision by the Commission not to raise objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure – Error of law – Serious difficulties – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Non-imposition of a fine.#Case T-47/19.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29127Case T-880/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Lianopoulou v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Decision on invalidity — Opinion of the invalidity committee — Article 78 of the Staff Regulations — Duty to state reasons)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29128Case T-699/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — FT and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Commission staff posted to a third country — Update of the correction coefficients — Manifest error of assessment — Retroactive effect — Legal certainty — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29129Case T-698/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — FJ and Others v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — EEAS staff posted to a third country — Update of the correction coefficients — Manifest error of assessment — Retroactive effect — Legal certainty — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29130Case T-611/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Iniciativa ‘Derecho de la UE, derechos de las minorías y democratización de las instituciones españolas’ v Commission (Institutional law — European citizens’ initiative — ‘EU law, minority rights and democratisation of Spanish institutions’ — New EU framework to strengthen the rule of law — Refusal of registration — Manifest lack of powers of the Commission — No invitation to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union — Article 4(2) and Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 296 TFEU)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29131Case T-580/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Borborudi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list — Error of assessment — Article 266 TFEU)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29132Case T-575/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Hill Mansilla v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2018 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — Comparative examination of the merits — Assessment criteria — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Non-discrimination)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29133Case T-514/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — DI v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Reimbursement of medical expenses and education expenses — Forgery — Disciplinary proceedings — Dismissal — Criminal proceedings — No further action taken — Acquittal — Competence of the Executive Board — Legal certainty — Time-barred disciplinary proceedings — Adage according to which ‘disciplinary proceedings arising out of a criminal offence must await the outcome of the criminal trial’ — Presumption of innocence — Impartiality of the Disciplinary Committee — Error of law — Probative value of the evidence — Reasonable time — Proportionality of the penalty — Intensity of the judicial review — Liability)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29134Case T-303/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29135Case T-302/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29136Case T-235/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — HIM v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Policy Support Programme — Audit report — Debit notes issued by the Commission — OLAF investigation — Action for annulment — Counterclaim — Full repayment of grants — Damages)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29137Case T-177/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Exxonmobil Petroleum & Chemical v ECHA (REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Inclusion of phenanthrene on that list — Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Weight of evidence determination — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29138Case T-47/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Dansk Erhverv v Commission (State aid — Sale of canned beverages in border shops in Germany to foreign residents — Exemption from the deposit on condition that the beverages purchased are consumed outside Germany — Complaint — Decision by the Commission not to raise objections — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Admissibility — Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure — Error of law — Serious difficulties — Concept of ‘State aid’ — State resources — Non-imposition of a fine)cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29139Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Roland SE v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam – Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C‑659/13 and C‑34/14 – Reinstitution of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty – Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid – Market economy treatment (MET) – Individual treatment (IT) – Desk analysis – Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information – Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties – Legal basis – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Non-retroactivity – Proportionality – Non-discrimination – Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Previous decision-making practice – Competence of national authorities and courts.#Case T-132/18.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021
29140Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Roland SE v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam – Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C‑659/13 and C‑34/14 – Reinstitution of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty – Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid – Market economy treatment (MET) – Individual treatment (IT) – Desk analysis – Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information – Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties – Legal basis – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Non-retroactivity – Proportionality – Non-discrimination – Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Previous decision-making practice – Competence of national authorities and courts.#Case T-132/18.cjeu_case · 9 juin 2021