Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
29102

Case T-266/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Global Chartered Controller Institute v EUIPO — CFA Institute (CCA CHARTERED CONTROLLER ANALYST CERTIFICATE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CCA CHARTERED CONTROLLER ANALYST CERTIFICATE — Earlier EU word mark CFA and earlier EU figurative mark CFA CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention)

cjeu_case ·
29110

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Iniciativa ciudadana « Derecho de la UE, derechos de las minorías y democratización de las instituciones españolas » v European Commission.#Institutional law – European citizens’ initiative – ‘EU law, minority rights and democratisation of Spanish institutions’ – New EU framework to strengthen the rule of law – Refusal of registration – Manifest lack of powers of the Commission – No invitation to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union – Article 4(2) and Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 296 TFEU.#Case T-611/19.

cjeu_case ·
29111

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Iniciativa ciudadana « Derecho de la UE, derechos de las minorías y democratización de las instituciones españolas » v European Commission.#Institutional law – European citizens’ initiative – ‘EU law, minority rights and democratisation of Spanish institutions’ – New EU framework to strengthen the rule of law – Refusal of registration – Manifest lack of powers of the Commission – No invitation to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union – Article 4(2) and Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 296 TFEU.#Case T-611/19.

cjeu_case ·
29112

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 June 2021 (Extracts).#Sayed Shamsuddin Borborudi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-580/19.

cjeu_case ·
29113

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 June 2021 (Extracts).#Sayed Shamsuddin Borborudi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-580/19.

cjeu_case ·
29116

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 June 2021.#DI v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Reimbursement of medical expenses and education expenses – Forgery – Disciplinary proceedings – Dismissal – Criminal proceedings – No further action taken – Acquittal – Competence of the Executive Board – Legal certainty – Time-barred disciplinary proceedings – Adage according to which ‘disciplinary proceedings arising out of a criminal offence must await the outcome of the criminal trial’ – Presumption of innocence – Impartiality of the Disciplinary Committee – Error of law – Probative value of the evidence – Reasonable time – Proportionality of the penalty – Intensity of the judicial review – Liability.#Case T-514/19.

cjeu_case ·
29117

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 June 2021.#DI v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Reimbursement of medical expenses and education expenses – Forgery – Disciplinary proceedings – Dismissal – Criminal proceedings – No further action taken – Acquittal – Competence of the Executive Board – Legal certainty – Time-barred disciplinary proceedings – Adage according to which ‘disciplinary proceedings arising out of a criminal offence must await the outcome of the criminal trial’ – Presumption of innocence – Impartiality of the Disciplinary Committee – Error of law – Probative value of the evidence – Reasonable time – Proportionality of the penalty – Intensity of the judicial review – Liability.#Case T-514/19.

cjeu_case ·
29118

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-303/19.

cjeu_case ·
29119

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-303/19.

cjeu_case ·
29120

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-302/19.

cjeu_case ·