2841Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2025.#MW v Slovak Telekom a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-423/25.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2842Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2025.#MW v Slovak Telekom a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov.#Case C-423/25.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2843Case C-836/25: Action brought on 16 December 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of Swedencjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2844Case C-423/25, Javlita: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber Chamber) of 16 December 2025 – (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov – Slovakia) – Criminal proceedings against Slovak Telekom a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2845Case C-226/25, VR Bank: Order of the President of the Court of 16 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg – Germany) – UR, VM v VR Bank Bodensee-Oberschwaben eGcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2846Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2025.#AF v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan denominated in a foreign currency – Unfair term placing the burden of the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of the finding that such a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Consequences of that invalidity – National legislation providing for an obligation for the consumer to request, in respect of those consequences, that that contract be declared ‘valid’ for the purposes of the national law – Choice to be made by the consumer between the ‘restoration of the former situation’ or the application of the rules on ‘unjust enrichment’.#Case C-565/23.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2847Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2025.#AF v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Case C-565/23.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2848Affaire C-565/23, Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – AF v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan denominated in a foreign currency – Unfair term putting placing the burden of the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of the finding that such a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Consequences of that invalidity – National legislation providing for an obligation for the consumer to request, in respect of those consequences, that that contract be declared valid for the purposes of the national law – Choice to be made by the consumer between the restoration of the former situation or the application of the rules on unjust enrichment)cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2025
2849Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 December 2025.#Harouna Douamba v Council of the European Union.#Case T-143/25.cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2850Case T-916/25, Denver and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Genova (Italy) made on 15 December 2025 – Criminal proceedings against WZ, YW, SH, HZ, DENVER Srl, CONSUMER Electronics SpAcjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2851Case T-870/25: Action brought on 15 December 2025 – Premiumsport Holding v EUIPO – H Young (Operations) (GENESIS)cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2852Case T-855/25: Action brought on 15 December 2025 – Hungary v Court of Justice of the European Unioncjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2853Case T-391/25: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2025 – DLF Beet Seed and United Beet Seeds v ECHAcjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2854Case T-386/25: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2025 – DLF Beet Seed and United Beet Seeds v ECHAcjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2855Case T-305/25: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2025 – DLF Beet Seed and United Beet Seeds v ECHAcjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2856Case T-143/25: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2025 – Douamba v Council (Action for annulment and for damages – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia's destabilising activities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2024/2643 (CFSP) – Misuse of powers – Freedom of expression – Failure to comply with formal requirements – Partial manifest inadmissibility – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2857Case T-95/25: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2025 – Doxychain v EUIPO – SERgroup Holding International (DoxyChain) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the application for registration – No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2858Order of the Court of 15 December 2025.#Abacus Research AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-610/25 P.cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2859Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois du 15 décembre 2025.#Abacus Research AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-610/25 P.cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025
2860Order of the Court of 15 December 2025.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-433/25 P.cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2025