261Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#Helpfind Funding SARL and Others v Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji ALLIANZ Polska S.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 1(2) and Articles 3, 18 and 28 – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Assignment to a professional of claims arising from insurance against civil liability in respect of motor vehicles by persons who have suffered material damage as a result of road traffic accidents – Legal standing of the assignee to enforce the payment of the assigned claim from the insurance undertakings concerned.#Case C-277/25.cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
262Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#Thüringer Aufbaubank v LN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 25 – Authentic instruments – Certification as a European Enforcement Order – Enforcement proceedings – Article 21(2) – Review as to its substance prohibited in the Member State of enforcement of the certification – Notarial instrument formally drawn up before the entry into force of that regulation – Temporal scope of that regulation disregarded by the competent authorities of the Member State of origin.#Case C-14/25.cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
264Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 25 June 2026.###cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
265Case C-343/25, CPAM de la Gironde: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie (CPAM) de la Gironde v LX (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Scope – point (a) of Article 3(1) – National legislation laying down the conditions for access to the non-standard-fee sector by self-employed doctors – Doctor who has obtained a qualification within a hospital located in another Member State – Requirement of two years’ experience as an assistant des hôpitaux pursuing his or her activity within that hospital under an employment contract – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment)cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
266Case C-277/25, Helpfind Funding and Others: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni – Poland) – Helpfind Funding SARL, GC, Nova DELTA XALTUM sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji ALLIANZ Polska S.A., and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 1(2) and Articles 3, 18 and 28 – Concept of injured party – Assignment to a professional of claims arising from insurance against civil liability in respect of motor vehicles by persons who have suffered material damage as a result of road traffic accidents – Legal standing of the assignee to enforce the payment of the assigned claim from the insurance undertakings concerned)cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
267Case C-14/25, Thüringer Aufbaubank: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – Thüringer Aufbaubank v LN (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 25 – Authentic instruments – Certification as a European Enforcement Order – Enforcement proceedings – Article 21(2) – Review as to its substance prohibited in the Member State of enforcement of the certification – Notarial instrument formally drawn up before the entry into force of that regulation – Temporal scope of that regulation disregarded by the competent authorities of the Member State of origin)cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
268Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#UJ and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil Service – Open Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of international cooperation and managing aid to non-EU countries – Repetition of written tests – Decision not to include the appellants’ names on the reserve list – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of correspondence between the administrative complaint and the judicial action – Action for annulment.#Case C-623/24 P.cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
269Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#VT v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil Service – Open Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of international cooperation and managing aid to non-EU countries – Repetition of written tests – Decision not to include the appellant’s name on the reserve list – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-622/24 P.cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
271Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Rantos, présentées le 25 juin 2026.###cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
272Case C-623/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 – UJ and Others v Commission (Technical problems during a competition) (Appeal – Civil Service – Open Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of international cooperation and managing aid to non-EU countries – Repetition of written tests – Decision not to include the appellants’ names on the reserve list – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of correspondence between the administrative complaint and the judicial action – Action for annulment)cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
273Case C-622/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 – VT v Commission (Technical problems during a competition) (Appeal – Civil Service – Open Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of international cooperation and managing aid to non-EU countries – Repetition of written tests – Decision not to include the appellant’s name on the reserve list – Principle of equal treatment)cjeu_case · June 24, 2026
274Case T-394/26: Action brought on 24 June 2026 – Bodegas Aguiuncho v EUIPO – Mar de Frades (ALBARIÑO mar de ons)cjeu_case · June 23, 2026
275Case T-393/26: Action brought on 24 June 2026 – Puma v EUIPO – CMS (CMS Italy)cjeu_case · June 23, 2026
276Case T-490/25: Order of the General Court of 24 June 2026 – Roja Parfums v EUIPO – Laurice El Badry Rahme (Bond No. 9 Manhattan)cjeu_case · June 23, 2026
277Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-875/25 P.cjeu_case · June 23, 2026
278Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-874/25 P.cjeu_case · June 23, 2026
279Case C-875/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 June 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-291/23, MeSoFa v SRB (Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)cjeu_case · June 23, 2026
280Case C-874/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 June 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-290/23, MeSoFa v SRB (Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)cjeu_case · June 23, 2026