27881Case C-927/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras’ UAB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 58(3) and (4) — Article 60(3) and (4) — Annex XII — Conduct of procurement procedures — Selection of participants — Selection criteria — Methods of proof — Economic and financial standing of economic operators — Whether the leader of a temporary association of undertakings may rely on income received in relation to a previous public contract in the same area as the public contract at issue including where it did not itself exercise the activity which is the subject matter of the public contract at issue — Technical and professional ability of economic operators — Exhaustive nature of means of proof permitted by the directive — Article 57(4)(h), (6) and (7) — Award of public service contracts — Non-compulsory grounds for exclusion from participation in a procurement procedure — Inclusion on a list of economic operators excluded from procurement procedures — Joint liability of members of a temporary association of undertakings — Personal nature of the penalty — Article 21 — Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to the contracting authority by an economic operator — Directive (EU) 2016/943 — Article 9 — Confidentiality — Protection of trade secrets — Applicability to procurement procedures — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 1 — Right to an effective remedy)cjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27882Case T-564/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Bremino-Grupp v Councilcjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27883Case T-563/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Zaytsev v Councilcjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27884Case T-555/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)cjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27885Case T-552/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Worldwide Brands v EUIPO — Guangyu Wan (CAMEL)cjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27886Case T-550/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO (COMMANDOS)cjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27887Case C-548/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol (Austria) lodged on 6 September 2021 — C.G. v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeckcjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27888Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2021.#MKB Multifunds BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Private equity fund – Complaint – Measures allegedly constituting State aid related to Dutch Venture Initiative – Decision adopted at the end of the preliminary procedure for reviewing aid – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Status as an interested party – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Inadmissibility.#Case T-277/20.cjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27889Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2021.#MKB Multifunds BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Private equity fund – Complaint – Measures allegedly constituting State aid related to Dutch Venture Initiative – Decision adopted at the end of the preliminary procedure for reviewing aid – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Status as an interested party – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Inadmissibility.#Case T-277/20.cjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27890Case T-277/20: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2021 — MKB Multifunds v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Private equity fund — Complaint — Measures allegedly constituting State aid related to Dutch Venture Initiative — Decision adopted at the end of the preliminary procedure for reviewing aid — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Status as an interested party — Safeguarding of procedural rights — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 6 septembre 2021
27891Case T-549/21: Action brought on 3 September 2021 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27892Case T-548/21: Action brought on 3 September 2021 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27893Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2021.#Johann A. Löning v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal manifestly unfounded – Tobacco and related products – Rules on packaging and labelling – Cigarette butts – Alleged failure to adopt stricter rules – Damage allegedly caused to the health of the applicant.#Case C-176/21 P.cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27894Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2021.#Johann A. Löning v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal manifestly unfounded – Tobacco and related products – Rules on packaging and labelling – Cigarette butts – Alleged failure to adopt stricter rules – Damage allegedly caused to the health of the applicant.#Case C-176/21 P.cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27895Case C-549/21 P: Appeal brought on 3 September 2021 by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro and Others against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 30 June 2021 in Case T-635/19 Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27896Case T-670/20: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2021 — SMCK Hair Care Products v EUIPO — Carolina Herrera (COOL GIRL)cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27897Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2021.#Amoena Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Headings 6212 and 9021 – Mastectomy bras – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 – Notion of ‘accessories’ – Interpretation of the judgment of 19 December 2019, Amoena (C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142).#Case C-706/20.cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27898Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2021.#Amoena Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Headings 6212 and 9021 – Mastectomy bras – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 – Notion of ‘accessories’ – Interpretation of the judgment of 19 December 2019, Amoena (C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142).#Case C-706/20.cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27899Case C-706/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 6212 and 9021 — Mastectomy bras — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 — Notion of ‘accessories’ — Interpretation of the judgment of 19 December 2019, Amoena (C 677/18, EU:C:2019:1142))cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021
27900Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2021.#Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Action for annulment – State aid – Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link – Individual aid – Act not open to challenge – Purely confirmatory measure – Preparatory measure.#Case C-173/19 P.cjeu_case · 3 septembre 2021