27861Case T-52/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — AH v Eurofound (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Disclosure of personal data — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Lack of competence of the author of an act adversely affecting a member of staff — Document prepared and signed by an external law firm — Liability — Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 8 septembre 2021
27862Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notices of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of public health and food safety – Restriction of the choice of language 2 to four languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-355/18.cjeu_case · 8 septembre 2021
27863Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notices of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of public health and food safety – Restriction of the choice of language 2 to four languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-355/18.cjeu_case · 8 septembre 2021
27864Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Naturgy Energy Group, SA, formerly Gas Natural SDG, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Environmental incentive adopted by Spain in favour of coal-fired power plants – Decision to initiate the procedure laid down by Article 108(2) TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Selective nature.#Case T-328/18.cjeu_case · 8 septembre 2021
27865Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Naturgy Energy Group, SA, formerly Gas Natural SDG, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Environmental incentive adopted by Spain in favour of coal-fired power plants – Decision to initiate the procedure laid down by Article 108(2) TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Selective nature.#Case T-328/18.cjeu_case · 8 septembre 2021
27866Case T-355/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — Spain v Commission (Rules on languages — Notices of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of public health and food safety — Restriction of the choice of language 2 to four languages — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination based on language — Interests of the service — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 8 septembre 2021
27867Case T-328/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — Naturgy Energy Group v Commission (State aid — Environmental incentive adopted by Spain in favour of coal-fired power plants — Decision to initiate the procedure laid down by Article 108(2) TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Selective nature)cjeu_case · 8 septembre 2021
27869Case T-566/21: Action brought on 7 September 2021 — Steinbach International v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27870Case T-558/21: Action brought on 7 September 2021 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino)cjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27871Case T-553/21: Action brought on 7 September 2021 — Agrarfrost v EUIPO — McCain (Shape of a smiley)cjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27872Case C-552/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2021 — FT v Land Hessecjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27873Case C-551/21: Action brought on 7 September 2021 — European Commission v Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27874Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2021 (Extracts).#Isopix SA v European Parliament.#Procedure – Taxation of costs.#Case T-163/20 DEP.cjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27875Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2021 (Extracts).#Isopix SA v European Parliament.#Procedure – Taxation of costs.#Case T-163/20 DEP.cjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27876Case T-754/19: Order of the General Court of 7 September 2021 — Stagecoach Group v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27877Case T-482/19: Order of the General Court of 7 September 2021 — BT Group and Communications Global Network Services v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27878Case T-475/19: Order of the General Court of 7 September 2021 — Bunzl and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27879Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 September 2021.#'Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras' v UAB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 58(3) and (4) – Article 60(3) and (4) – Annex XII – Conduct of procurement procedures – Selection of participants – Selection criteria – Methods of proof – Economic and financial standing of economic operators – Whether the leader of a temporary association of undertakings may rely on income received in relation to a previous public contract in the same area as the public contract at issue including where it did not itself exercise the activity which is the subject matter of the public contract at issue – Technical and professional ability of economic operators – Exhaustive nature of means of proof permitted by the directive – Article 57(4)(h), (6) and (7) – Award of public service contracts – Non-compulsory grounds for exclusion from participation in a procurement procedure – Inclusion on a list of economic operators excluded from procurement procedures – Joint liability of members of a temporary association of undertakings – Personal nature of the penalty – Article 21 – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to the contracting authority by an economic operator – Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Article 9 – Confidentiality – Protection of trade secrets – Applicability to procurement procedures – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-927/19.cjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021
27880Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 September 2021.#'Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras' v UAB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 58(3) and (4) – Article 60(3) and (4) – Annex XII – Conduct of procurement procedures – Selection of participants – Selection criteria – Methods of proof – Economic and financial standing of economic operators – Whether the leader of a temporary association of undertakings may rely on income received in relation to a previous public contract in the same area as the public contract at issue including where it did not itself exercise the activity which is the subject matter of the public contract at issue – Technical and professional ability of economic operators – Exhaustive nature of means of proof permitted by the directive – Article 57(4)(h), (6) and (7) – Award of public service contracts – Non-compulsory grounds for exclusion from participation in a procurement procedure – Inclusion on a list of economic operators excluded from procurement procedures – Joint liability of members of a temporary association of undertakings – Personal nature of the penalty – Article 21 – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to the contracting authority by an economic operator – Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Article 9 – Confidentiality – Protection of trade secrets – Applicability to procurement procedures – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-927/19.cjeu_case · 7 septembre 2021