Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
27641

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-97/20.

cjeu_case ·
27642

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-97/20.

cjeu_case ·
27643

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-95/20.

cjeu_case ·
27644

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-95/20.

cjeu_case ·
27650

Case T-274/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — MHCS v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Shade of the colour orange) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative EU mark depicting a shade of the colour orange — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Nature of the mark — Colour mark — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
27651

Case T-240/20 to T-245/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Arnaoutakis and Others v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme — Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension — Plea of illegality — Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament — Rights acquired and future entitlements — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Legal certainty)

cjeu_case ·
27652

Case T-207/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Residencial Palladium v EUIPO — Palladium Gestión (PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS — Admissibility criteria for an application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
27653

Case T-127/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — France v ECHA (REACH — Substance evaluation — Aluminium chloride — Aluminium chloride, basic — Aluminium sulphate — ECHA decisions requesting further information — Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal — Multiple grounds for the decision of the Board of Appeal — Grounds capable of justifying the decision — Inoperative nature of the pleas directed against the other grounds)

cjeu_case ·
27654

Case T-110/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Kanyama v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
27655

Case T-109/20: Judgment of the General Court 15 September 2021 — Numbi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
27656

Case T-107/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
27657

Case T-106/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 –Amisi Kumba v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
27658

Case T-105/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Ruhorimbere v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
27659

Case T-104/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Ramazani Shadary v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
27660

Case T-103/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 –Mutondo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·